When we claim alarms as “safe guards” in our PHA

I have referenced these writers before when discussing process safety and once again they communicated the message better than I could regarding how we should analyze “process alarms” when we claim them to be a layer of protection.  We should only accept alarms that have been established using a RAGAGEP in their design (audible, visual, human machine interface (HMI), and response times).  Here is their more in-depth analysis…

  http://www.isa.org/InTechTemplate.cfm?template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=78986<;/object>

Scroll to Top