This topic is a bit off, but for some reason, this issue is trending in our RMP/PSM audit findings. We have been finding this since we began performing RMP audits in the 2002-2003 time frame, but the numbers are trending up. Now, this is NOT about a “hazardous condition,” but in almost all our cases, this error is made by a paid consulting firm (i.e., preparer). Personally, I believe some of these cases are a flat-out rip-off of the customer, as the proposal was based on the number of RMPs to be prepared – for the SAME FACILITY. The site was hiring a third party to help them – not to rip them off. In almost ALL scenarios, a traditional facility will have a SINGLE Risk Management Plan, albeit that single plan may have multiple processes reported in it. Here’s how it suppose to work/look: