Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)

Is the 1-U form for my pressure vessel really not a PSM requirement?

Already, in less than 24 hours from when I posted the OSHRC decision on the BP Refinery, I have received over a dozen e-mails asking me “do I have to have U-1 forms for my pressure vessels?”.  There are not many PSM/RMP facilities that have not been dinged with one of these findings over the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Is the 1-U form for my pressure vessel really not a PSM requirement? Read More »

OSHRC frowns on OSHA’s use of “Internal Reports/Documents” to issue PSM citations

On March 8, 2010, the Secretary issued three citations to a refinery, alleging twenty serious, forty-two willful, and three other-than-serious violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 651, et seq. The Secretary issued the citations following an inspection conducted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) at…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHRC frowns on OSHA’s use of “Internal Reports/Documents” to issue PSM citations Read More »

What do I have to do for material and energy balances?

For new processes, you must document both material and energy inputs and outputs of a process. For example, you would document the quantity of a regulated substance added to the process, the quantity consumed during the process, and the quantity that remains in the output. This requirement will not generally apply to storage processes.  CLICK…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

What do I have to do for material and energy balances? Read More »

Run to failure… Can it be done while achieving process safety?

In the past couple of months, I had several conversations with process safety professionals asking about “running equipment to failure” within a chemical process handling a highly hazardous chemical (HHC) or extremely hazardous substance (EHS). These discussions were often lively and I was actually called “a consultant” “that needed to walk a mile in my…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Run to failure… Can it be done while achieving process safety? Read More »

The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors Report of Violation Findings for First Quarter 2013

The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors has released its First Quarter Report of Violation Findings for 2013.  The modified violation tracking system launched in July 2012 and captures a clearer picture of problem areas and trends related to boiler and pressure vessel operation, installation, maintenance, and repair. The data also identifies problems…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors Report of Violation Findings for First Quarter 2013 Read More »

Looking for some technical data for one of your pressure vessels?

The National Board has announced 1,530,716 registrations of boilers, pressure vessels, attachments, and nuclear equipment for the fiscal year 2013 (July 1, 2012–June 30, 2013).  The National Board maintains manufacturers’ data reports on all boilers and pressure vessels registered with the National Board. Each data report includes the name of the manufacturer, the item’s National…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Looking for some technical data for one of your pressure vessels? Read More »

CFATs Program Statistics as of August 1, 2013

More than 44,000 preliminary assessments were reviewed by DHS from facilities with chemicals of interest 4,298 facilities are currently covered by CFATS More than 3,000 facilities voluntarily removed, reduced, or modified their holdings of chemicals of interest 1276 visits to assist facilities with compliance 589 Security Plans authorized 182 Security Plans approved following an onsite inspection…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

CFATs Program Statistics as of August 1, 2013 Read More »

How can I determine if my facility’s wastewater treatment operation meets the Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards (CFATS) exemption under 6 CFR 27.110(b) for the Federal Water Pollution Control Act?

Section 27.110(b) of 6 CFR exempts from CFATS “Treatment Works,” as defined in section 212 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Pub. L. 92-500, as amended. If an industrial facility treats its wastewater and that water is directly discharged into a body of water without further treatment, then the facility must be registered with…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

How can I determine if my facility’s wastewater treatment operation meets the Chemical Facility Anti- Terrorism Standards (CFATS) exemption under 6 CFR 27.110(b) for the Federal Water Pollution Control Act? Read More »

“It’s just Ammonia” – yep it sure is!

UPDATED 8/17/14 Routinely we hear the argument that Anhydrous Ammonia should not be on OSHA’s or EPA’s chemical lists for PSM/RMP inclusion.  Like most industries that use a single highly hazardous chemical as a “utility” in their process(es) v.s. manufacturing the HHC or using the HHC in the manufacturing process, these industries feel “their chemical”…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

“It’s just Ammonia” – yep it sure is! Read More »

Executive Order – Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security

The White House, Office of the Press Secretary For Immediate Release August 01, 2013 EXECUTIVE ORDER – IMPROVING CHEMICAL FACILITY SAFETY AND SECURITY By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:    Section 1. Purpose. Chemicals, and the facilities…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Executive Order – Improving Chemical Facility Safety and Security Read More »

Passivation… PSM/RMP activity that belongs in the “initial start-up” SOP?

A common situation we find is that facilities struggle to understand how their “initial start-up” procedure for a new piece of process equipment can/will differ from their other start-up procedures for the equipment (e.g. normal, after a turnaround, after an emergency shutdown, etc.). Recently I have learned of a process used on galvanized condenser coils/tubes that…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Passivation… PSM/RMP activity that belongs in the “initial start-up” SOP? Read More »

Making the case my PSM/RMP covered process complies with RAGAGEPs (Piping)

There is one small little sentence in 1910.119 (as well as Part 68) that is causing all kinds of heartburn. I like to call this requirement the “General Duty Clause” of process safety. To fully understand what this requirement entails we first have to understand what is meant by a standard being a “performance oriented”…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Making the case my PSM/RMP covered process complies with RAGAGEPs (Piping) Read More »

Scroll to Top