Most, unfortunately not all, process safety professionals will agree that doing a “line break” on an actual process pipe containing the PSM/RMP covered chemical (HHC/EHS) falls within 1910.119(f)(4) or 68.69(d). But when it comes to “process hoses”, there remain many application questions. For me, any time the “process” is opened I break the task down into either “Routine Opening” that will be covered by an annually certified SOP and “Non-Routine Opening” that will be covered by a line break/opening safe work permit. Disconnecting a hose is without a doubt (in my eyes) “opening the process”; how we decide to manage the risks associated with this task is open for debate and discussion. For example, we would not issue a safe work permit each time we disconnect an unloading hose associated with unloading a tanker truck; however, this task and its hazards would be covered in the annually certified PSM/RMP Truck Unloading SOP. Here is an incident from OSHA’s Case Files demonstrating the hazards of disconnecting “process hoses”:
At 11:30 p.m. on March 25, 2017, an employee was holding a hose that was being replaced by a coworker. The employee was sprayed with chlorine liquid as a coworker unscrewed a transfer hose. The employee suffered chemical burns from the chlorine liquid.
|
Violation Summary
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serious | Willful | Repeat | Other | Unclass | Total | |
| Initial Violations | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Current Violations | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Initial Penalty | $25,350 | $25,350 | ||||
| Current Penalty | $12,675 | $12,675 | ||||
| Violation Items | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Standard | Issuance | Abate | Curr$ | Init$ |
| Serious | 19100132 D01 I | 09/14/2017 | 10/19/2017 | $12,675 | $12,675 |
| Serious | 19100134 D01 III | 09/14/2017 | 10/19/2017 | $0 | $12,675 |
CLICK HERE for the OSHA File
