Bryan Haywood

NFPA 70E® 2012 20 Most Frequently Asked Questions By Michael Fontaine

We receive hundreds of questions each week and these are the 20 most frequently asked questions and the answers on NFPA 70E®.   1. What section of Article 130 do you consider to be the most important?  I consider 130.1 to be the most important because it points out that all of the requirements in…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

30 incidents & 0 updates (6/2/13)

  Many THANKS to my NEWEST and RENEWING Corporate Partners in Safety…   since 2013 returning from 2007 since 2004 since 2013 2013 Fatality Tracker Electrical 11 (2012 = 68) (2011 = 81) (2010 = 90) (2009 = 100) Forklift/Manlift 26 (2012 = 52) (2011 = 84) (2010 = 110) (2009 = 88) Mining* 36…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Compliance Tip: Air Receivers

What are the TWO (2) safety items that MUST be present on ALL air receivers (e.g. pressure vessels)?  We do not have to have a degree in Mechanical Engineering to identify these BASIC needs; rather we just need to inspect EACH of our receivers! 1910.169(b)(3)(i) Every air receiver shall be equipped with an indicating pressure gage (so…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP GDC citations w/ FAILURE of HCL Tank ($37K)

The Respondent manufactures adsorbent synthetic magnesium silicate, ammonium chloride, and lignosulfonate. The facility contains hydrochloric acid and ammonia. Tank T-5C is a Hydrochloric Acid storage tank thats used to feed raw materials to the blending reactor to make NH4CL solution. At approximately 10:15 pm on October 24, 2012, there was a tank failure of the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Ammonia Incidents in NY State

Of 2,415 reported releases of hazardous substances, 107 (4.4%) involved ammonia. Of the 814 people injured during releases of hazardous substances, 61 (7.5%) were injured following ammonia events. Equipment failure caused 58% of the ammonia releases and injured 38 people. Most ammonia releases involved piping (44%). 44% of injured people were employees, 41% were members…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Ammonia Refrigeration FATALITY – Compressor Pump Out Valve

On Monday August 14, 1989, high liquid level alarms sounded several times throughout the day in the Engine Room of XXXXXXXX indicating high amounts of liquid ammonia returning from the production area to the engine room. Mr. XXXXXXXX began his shift at 4 pm between 5 pm and 5:15 pm hammering was heard in the “No. 2 XXXX Compressor” (1962)…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP citations @ Ice Plant ($61K)

On December 5, 2010, EPA conducted an inspection (EPA inspection) of the Facility to determine compliance with CAA § ll2(r)(7). During the inspection, EPA observed alleged violations of the CAA § 112(r)(7). The alleged violations are described below…… Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a member? Log in...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Company to pay over $1M to OSHA and EPA for fatal NH3 release during pump down (NH3 Refrigeration)

On August 31, 2007, a release of ammonia occurred at the company’s Waterloo Facility during the transfer of ammonia via a “pump out” line. This release resulted in the death of one employee and the permanent disability of a second employee. Based on EPA’s investigation of the 2007 accident, the Complaint alleges violations of Section…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Incentive Program “TEAM APPROACH” uses peer pressure in a SAFETY POSITIVE way

Recently OSHA has been making waves in the “incentive program” arena and in most cases, rightfully so! But incentive programs DO WORK when they are IMPLEMENTED and MEASURED PROPERLY! The big concern with incentives is that the employer puts too much emphasis on the end results and NOT ON the SAFETY PROCESS that produces the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top