Free

Why I would never ask… “What if the RV has an incorrect set point” in my What-if Analysis

As I have stated already this week, I am a HAZOP kind of guy.  I have used just about every methodology under the sun over the past 25+ years, and I have come to a personal conclusion that in almost every occasion, a HAZOP would have been the best methodology to utilize for a correct…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

What is my FIRST LAYER of protection?

Earlier this week I posted about how a PHA should document its consideration of the engineering controls and administrative controls failing. And I said back in the 2013 posting; this little requirement is intended to make facilities dig past a single layer of protection and maybe even identify a lack of engineering and/or administrative controls…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

UPDATE on OSHRC and Court Decision on LOTO Fatality involving a counter weight

This is a follow-up to a previously posted case.  An electrical contractor at a steel mill was in a danger zone when the mill technician began locking out the equipment.  The LOTO procedure required some counterweights to be lowered to the ground (i.e., ZES).  When the mill technician released the counterweight, an apprentice with the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA’s Potential Revisions to the Process Safety Management Standard

With all the recent attention being paid to EPA and it’s Risk Management Plan amendments and many of those amendments being rescinded by the new administration, I thought it would be a good time to remind those in the PSM/RMP world, that OSHA has their own wish list (my phrase – not theirs) and some of…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA’s Proposed Changes: Rescind Incident Investigation, Third-Party Audit, Safer Technology and Alternatives Analysis (STAA), and Other Prevention Program Amendments (May 2018)

In the RMP Amendments rule, EPA added three major provisions to the accident prevention program of Subparts C (for Program 2 processes)and D (for Program 3 processes). These included: A requirement in § 68.60 and § 68.81 for all facilities with Program 2 or 3 processes to conduct a root cause analysis using a recognized…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA’s estimated costs of chemical accidents with off-site impacts

EPA monetized both on-site and off-site damages. EPA estimated total average annual on-site damages of $265.8 million. The largest monetized average annual on-site damage was on-site property damage, which resulted in average annual damage of approximately $205.5 million. The next largest impact was on-site fatalities ($49.8 million) and injuries ($10.5 million).  EPA estimated total average…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Try to look at your next PHA in a different frame of mind

Over the years I have facilitated and participated in hundreds of PHAs from toxics to flammables and even some explosives (although not my thing!).  And in doing so, one thing that drives me crazy is the lack of structure in how process deviations are identified and studied/analyzed.  I love the HAZOP methodology and hate the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Does an ammonia refrigeration tech need to be a “qualified electrical worker”?

This is a common question we get when we are working at facilities where there is a mechanical refrigeration system… Do my refrigeration technicians have to be “qualified electrical workers”? Because that question is so broad, we always answer “Yes”, based on our experience around these types of processes, but it depends and here are…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Recommended improvements to EPA’s RMP inspection process (OIG 2018)

In the EPA Office of Inspector General’s Semiannual Report to Congress: Oct 1, 2017 – March 31, 2018 we see two “recommendations” regarding the manner in which EPA conducts their Risk Management Plan (RMP) audits and how the OIG feels the process could be improved upon.  These are a continuation of improvement from the 2013…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

2018 Video of the Week #21 (Flash Fire Demo)

With this week’s flash fire that sent over 20 workers to the hospital, I thought this video would be timely.  This is a demo video by an FRC maker, and it shows us how the vapor and flame interact.    … Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA’s official interpretation and explanation of the phrase “on site in one location”

For some reason, we have seen a spike in questions and request to assess the applicability of PSM/RMP covered process(s), and this is beyond the typical “can use the Meer decision to get our flammable process out of PSM?” questions.  So I thought it would be helpful to publish OSHA’s official interpretation and explanation of…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top