Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)

There is a BIG difference between a Compressed Gas and a Liquified Pressurized Gas (and it matters immensely!)

It has been a while since we have mentioned/discussed the refrigerant HFO-1234yf – which has taken the car manufacturer’s on a ride down the PSM lane of H_LL!  I have had several discussions with these businesses and for the life of me, I am puzzled as to where this idea that NFPA 55: Compressed Gases…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

There is a BIG difference between a Compressed Gas and a Liquified Pressurized Gas (and it matters immensely!) Read More »

NFPA 58 (the leading Flammable Gas code) updated to 2020 Edition

With the absence of an OSHA Flammable Gas standard I have been using NFPA 58 since 1994 and it is one of my all time favorite RAGAGEPs.  I am always pushing clients to use it for their flammable gases, as well as the IFC Chapter 58, especially when their flammable gases are stored/processes/handled as a…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

NFPA 58 (the leading Flammable Gas code) updated to 2020 Edition Read More »

Piping inspections during installation (API 570)

I recently received a question from a client about “piping inspection methods for newly installed piping”. It seems that a general contractor was advising the facility that they were “required” to do some “thickness testing” on newly installed piping as part of the installation QA/QC. The PSE asked me “So are we required to take…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Piping inspections during installation (API 570) Read More »

PSM and Aerosol (Flammable Gas) Containers Stored in Warehouses/Distribution Centers

This is an EXCELLENT LOI from OSHA that covers three (3) IMPORTANT aspect of PSM applicability: Co-Location of smaller containers of flammables that could be impacted by a single event (i.e. fire) Once a process is PSM covered it remains such UNTIL such time the employer puts in place a means to LIMIT the quantity of the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

PSM and Aerosol (Flammable Gas) Containers Stored in Warehouses/Distribution Centers Read More »

Why some refrigerant piping falls into ASME B31.3 rather than B31.5

The car manufacturers have begun using a new refrigerant for our cars and trucks air conditioning systems.  This new refrigerant, HFO-1234yf, is received by truck, stored as a liquified (pressurized) gas, and dispensed into the vehicles A/C unit.  The piping associated with this storage and transfer of this refrigerant must meet…… Membership Required You must...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Why some refrigerant piping falls into ASME B31.3 rather than B31.5 Read More »

Is a CUI inspection required for insulated vessels?

We see a lot about Corrosion Under Insulation (CUI) as it relates to piping, but we can not forget that the same failure mode can occur on vessels as well.  API 510 spells out some ranges as to when we MUST consider the need for a CUI inspection on our vessel(s)…. Membership Required You must...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Is a CUI inspection required for insulated vessels? Read More »

API 510 Internal Inspection Frequency

Sorry for a lack of posts these last couple of weeks, they have been crazy with travel and work.  But I wanted to follow-up on a lot of questions and comments I got regarding my “Internal inspections… of my pressure vessel??? We don’t need no internal inspections” post a few weeks back.  If your engineers/management…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

API 510 Internal Inspection Frequency Read More »

EPA’s RMP Vulnerable zone determination

One way EPA selects facilities to be inspected is by “Vulnerable Zones”.  These are areas that could be affected by a release from a chemical accident at a facility subject to the risk management program requirements in 40 CFR Part 68.  So how can a facility determine if they are one of the many facilities that impact a “vulnerable zone” and…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA’s RMP Vulnerable zone determination Read More »

ORFA Commentary on Ontario-related Legislation, Regulations, and Registered Refrigeration Plant Operational Best Practices

The Ontario Recreation Facilities Association Inc. (ORFA) has reviewed the Fernie, BC Ammonia Triple Fatality investigation report produced by Technical Safety British Columbia (the safety authority and governing body for pressure vessels and operating engineers in BC), and offers the following comparative as it relates to Ontario related legislation, regulations, and registered refrigeration plant operational…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

ORFA Commentary on Ontario-related Legislation, Regulations, and Registered Refrigeration Plant Operational Best Practices Read More »

UK’s HSE Safety Alert – Catastrophic rupture of dead-leg pipe-work

Catastrophic rupture of dead-leg pipe-work Issue Date: 20.08.2019 Target Audience: Operators of Process Plant (and associated inspection bodies) which may have pipe-work dead-legs on toxic, flammable, dangerous to the environment or other critical services. Oil and gas (onshore / offshore) Chemical processing and production Nuclear Pharmaceutical Power production Key Issues: This safety alert highlights the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

UK’s HSE Safety Alert – Catastrophic rupture of dead-leg pipe-work Read More »

EPA RMP Program 1 five-year accident history and hazard assessment differences

Pursuant to the risk management program regulations under 40 CFR §68.10(b), Program 1 eligibility requires that the process has not had an accidental release of a regulated substance that led to off-site death, injury, or response and restoration activities at an environmental receptor within five years prior to the risk management plan submission. Additionally, as…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP Program 1 five-year accident history and hazard assessment differences Read More »

Scroll to Top