A Process Safety Management System (PSMS) is built off the SIF approach many companies are dipping their toes into today. If you are a PSM/RMP-covered facility, you already have an SMS; it’s just called a PSMS, and it is a 14-element SMS that is ALL about the SIF approach. YOU ARE CLOSER TO SIF then […]
Too often, management will view the decline in recordable injuries as a positive trend without understanding the driving force(s) behind this trend. It is common to find a decrease in reportable injuries in line with a decrease in total reported incidents. We call this “Low Confidence”. We can have a higher level of confidence when
I am updating my SMS/HF course for a course in October. This may be helpful to some. This is the James Reason HF model. I have shared other graphics of his model over the years, but this one and the one from our friend at the UK’s HSE are my favorites. I hope that some
Someone pinch me! It is 2023, and I’m still teaching HAZMAT, Hot Work, and PRCS courses, where most students use direct-reading instruments daily. And yet, none of them have ever been trained on the LIMITATIONS of the brand/model of direct-reading instruments they use. There are dozens of reasons why this is what it is, but
One of the biggest mistakes we see in BBS processes is the fundamental misunderstanding of a BBS process’s role in an SMS. Each observation is NOT about looking for unsafe behaviors; rather, it should be more about reinforcing the SAFE behaviors. Suppose an organization has a high rate of observed deviant behaviors from prescribed Safe
Maybe it’s my age, but I have grown tired of organizations that proclaim their dedication to safety. Yet, they have no desire to put in place a formal and measurable SAFETY PROCESS/SMS that INVOLVES the men and women we work to protect. It is not rocket science, and it is the most basic and PROVEN
It is a common thing to hear regarding safety in workplaces today… “Own it”. The concept is solid; management wants broad ownership of safety. Safety is NOT safety’s job, after all. But like many safety movements, this one usually fails in significant ways because it takes years of educating and motivating a workplace to accept
Many organizations struggle to identify “safety metrics” besides their lagging indicators. But the PRCS article I posted Friday night contains at least a dozen metrics around our PRCS safety management efforts. There are a lot of “SIF salespersons” out there selling their “SIF approach.” On the other end of the SMS spectrum are the facilities
I hate this meme! This is an employee taking a shortcut and reflects the culture. But in almost every depiction of this photo, the intent is that the employee(s) know best, and we need to suit their wishes. Such garbage. If we have the employees involved in writing the SOP(s) and we train them well
I have written over 180 articles on the topic of Permit-Required Confined Spaces. We can agree there is a lot to write and talk about on this topic. In our travels, we do a lot of work with clients around their PRCS management; most of the time, this work is more “technical.” In this article,
Scenario: The client invites the manufacturer of a piece of equipment that we evaluated and determined the space to be a PRCS. The client used the popular argument of “no one else treats these as a PRCS.” And the manufacturer rep explains how this latest model is made specifically for entry. So, therefore, in their
Last month, I wrote Before we can achieve a ZES, we must first define and quantify what precisely a form of “hazardous energy” is, and this week, I posted the MSHA accident investigation report where water in an abandoned chilled water system 1600′ underground was opened and the water, pressurized by the head pressure alone,
