Safety Info Posts

EPA’s proposing changes requiring updating RAGAGEPs

EPA initially looks to the latest version of industry codes, standards, and guidelines to determine whether an owner or operator has documented compliance with RAGAGEP under 40 CFR 68.65(d)(2), given that 40 CFR part 68 does not define the phrase “recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.” EPA believes this application makes sense because the

EPA considering changing their postion on “Storage Incident to Transportation” in regards to RMP Thresholds

Currently, under 40 CFR 68.3, the term “stationary source” does NOT apply to transportation activities, including storage incident to transportation for any regulated substance or any other extremely hazardous substance.  A stationary source does include transportation containers connected to loading/unloading equipment or used for storage, not incident to transportation. Still, the term “storage, not incident

OSHA announces changes to the Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP) to strengthen enforcement, improve compliance

The new criteria include violations of all hazards and OSHA standards and will continue to focus on repeat offenders in all industries. Previously, an employer could be in the program for failing to meet a limited number of standards. The changes will broaden the program’s scope with the possibility that additional industries will fall within

EPA issues RMP GDC citations @ manufacturer of electro-optical components ($46K)

The respondent’s facility (“Facility”) is located in a mixed-use area. The Facility is located on the third and fourth floors of a mixed-use commercial/industrial building that houses medical offices, a deli, and other businesses. The Facility is located within a third of a mile of several tourist attractions, including museums and restaurants. The east end

EPA Should Ensure Regulated Facilities Consider Risks from Climate Change

Why GAO Did This Study? Over 11,000 RMP facilities across the nation have extremely hazardous chemicals in amounts that could harm people, property, or the environment if accidentally released. Risks to these facilities include those posed by natural hazards, which may damage the facilities and potentially release the chemicals into surrounding communities. Climate change mayAccording

Determining the amount released for Ammonia and Ammonium Hydroxide for Release Notification Requirements under CERCLA section 103 and EPCRA section 304

Ammonia (CAS# 7664-41-7) is an Extremely Hazardous Substance (EHS), listed at 40 CFR Part 355 Appendix A  EPA website and Appendix B with a reportable quantity (RQ) of 100 lbs. Both ammonia and ammonium hydroxide (CAS# 1336-21-6) are listed as Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) hazardous substances at 40 CFR 302.4. Under

Scroll to Top