Safety Info Posts

EPA RMP… Does this require the owner or operator to submit an annual update or certification to EPA or the implementing agency?

The owner or operator of a facility who must prepare a Risk Management Plan (RMP) for a Program 3 process is required to develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information (40 CFR §68.69(a)). The owner or operator…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP… What are considered industrial buildings, commercial buildings, or recreational areas, and how can they be identified?

Pursuant to the hazard assessment requirements in 40 CFR Part 68, Subpart B, an owner or operator is required to conduct an offsite consequence analysis and analyze a worst-case release scenario and alternative release scenarios as part of a risk management plan (RMP). When completing these scenarios, public receptors need to be identified. A public…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP… For the five-year accident history, does the owner or operator need to include accidental releases that were only released onto the land or into water?

Pursuant to 40 CFR §68.42(a), the owner or operator of a stationary source subject to the risk management program regulations must document significant accidental releases of regulated substances from a covered process in the five years prior to the submission of an initial or updated risk management plan (RMP). For the five-year accident history, does…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP… Do the quantities of two separate vessels that are interconnected with a closed valve need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis? 

Pursuant to the risk management program regulations, facilities must perform an offsite consequence analysis for the worst-case release scenario. Do the quantities of two separate vessels that are interconnected with a closed valve need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis? … Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP… What is the definition of fuel for the purposes of exclusion?

A flammable substance listed in 40 CFR §68.130 is excluded from the risk management program regulations when it is used as a fuel or held for sale as a fuel at a retail facility (§68.126). What is the definition of fuel for the purposes of this exclusion?… Membership Required You must be a member to...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP… Are mechanical controls such as alarms considered administrative controls and therefore limit the worst-case release quantity?

For the purpose of analyzing the worst-case release scenario required as part of the hazard assessment at 40 CFR Part 68, Subpart B, the worst-case release quantity is identified as the greatest amount held in a single vessel or pipe, taking into account administrative controls that limit the maximum quantity (40 CFR §68.25(b)). Are mechanical…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP… Do all facilities subject to the risk management program regulations have to develop an emergency response program?

The risk management program regulations require the owner or operator of a covered stationary source to develop and implement an emergency response program as described in 40 CFR §68.95, which must include an emergency response plan, emergency response equipment procedures, employee training, and procedures to ensure the program is up-to-date. Do all facilities subject to…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Expansion/Seismic hoses, excess flow valves, and check valves

What I am going to suggest in this article is NOT necessarily a code or standard requirement, but just some SOUND ADVICE on how to improve safety around expansion/seismic joints where hoses are utilized to allow for flexibility.  As my clients know, I HATE hoses in a chemical process and I am OCD when it…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Does an PRCS attendant need respiratory protection?

I am sure the thought has crossed everyone’s mind who has issued an entry permit for a HAZ ATM entry… “should the attendant be in breathing air as well?”.  Is there an exposure potential for the attendant to the HAZ ATM from within the PRCS?  Most attendants are stationed right outside the entry portal, add…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Is a palletizer a Permit-Required Confined Space?

One of the biggest mistakes I see in my auditing and the biggest frustration I have when facilities state they treat all of their confined spaces as PRCS is that most have not recognized the fact that a roll-off trash compactor and/or large palletizers are actually Permit-Required Confined Spaces.  For example, we have a large…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Falls, Permit-Required Confined Spaces, and Reclassifying the space

Our behind the scenes debate continues and now a number of clients have joined in with their take on the matter. The fundamental part of our debate has come down to two (2) positions: does a fall inside or into a Confined Space make that CS a Permit-Required Confined Space? if you said yes to…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP GDC @ food facility (NH3 & $90K)

Respondent operates an ammonia refrigerant system which contains approximately 8,487 pounds of ammonia which is processed, handled, and stored in the ammonia refrigerant systems, and ammonia is a regulated extremely hazardous substance listed under Section 112(r)(3) at 40 C.F.R. § 68.130. EPA inspected the Facility on June 7, 2018. Prior to the June 7, 2018…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top