On October 26, 2018, Respondent became the owner and operator of the facility upon the completion of a merger. According to Respondent’s RMP, Respondent handles approximately 22,477 pounds of anhydrous ammonia at the Facility. EPA conducted an inspection of the Facility on April 18, 2018, to evaluate the Facility’s compliance with CAA Section 112(r). On…...
Respondent owns and operates an agricultural storage and supply facility. On August 16, 2016, an accidental release of anhydrous ammonia occurred at Respondent’s Facility when filling a storage tank. The release resulted in the hospitalization of an employee. 22. On or about March 12, 2019, representatives of the EPA conducted an inspection of Respondent’s Facility…...
This inspection was for the purpose of determining compliance with Section 112(r)(7) accidental release prevention requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. The scope of this Inspection may include, but is not limited to: reviewing and obtaining copies of documents and records Interviews and taking of statements reviewing of chemical storage, handling,…...
Respondent is a Poultry Processor doing business in the States of Alabama, Arkansas, and Mississippi. On November 10, 2016, the EPA issued to Respondent a Notice of Concern letter which informed the Respondent that EPA had concerns that the Respondent was not in compliance with the CAA Section 112(r). The Respondent and EPA met on…...
This is a lesson in reporting your releases! Two releases of anhydrous ammonia from a refrigeration process result in $150,000 in fines ($75K for EPCRA and $75K for CERCLA) and a $425,000 SEP to install detectors and emergency shutdown systems. The Complaint alleges that: Respondent violated Section 103(a) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and…...
Respondent owns a chemical supply outlet where chlorine was present in a process above the 2,500 pounds TQ, and sulfur dioxide was in a present in a process above the 5,000 pounds TQ from at least March 16, 2010. Respondent was required to submit and have in place an RMP for the facility. Under 40…...
Respondent is a business that owns and operates two (2) refrigerated warehouse and storage facilities located in Nebraska and Minnesota. The Nebraska facility is located in EPA Region 7 and the Minnesota facility is located in EPA Region 5. Information gathered during the EPA inspection revealed that Respondent had greater than 10,000 pounds of anhydrous…...
Respondent operates a seafood processing facility where anhydrous ammonia was present in a process above the 10,000 pounds TQ. Respondent has one program 3 process, an ammonia refrigeration process consisting of a brine chiller system, seven plate freezers, one blast freezer and one ice house with three ice machines. An RMP was submitted for the…...
OSHA has cited a refinery for serious violations of safety and health hazards related to process safety management (PSM) following a fire and subsequent explosions at the company’s Refinery Complex in June 2019. The company faces $132,600 in penalties. OSHA’s inspection found deficiencies in the refinery’s PSM program, including failing to establish or implement written…...
Respondent is the owner and operator of a facility that had greater than 10,000 pounds of anhydrous ammonia in a process at each of its facilities. From the time Respondent first had onsite greater than 10,000 pounds of anhydrous ammonia in a process, Respondent was subject to the requirements of 40 C.F.R. Part 68 because…...
Respondent owns a chemical supply outlet where chlorine was present in a process above the 2,500 pounds TQ, and sulfur dioxide was in a present in a process above the 5,000 pounds TQ from at least March 16, 2010. Respondent has two (2) program 3 processes: a chlorine cylinder storage process, and a sulfur dioxide…...
Respondent is the owner of a food transfer and storage facility and according to their risk management plan for the Facility, Respondent uses approximately 25,225 pounds of anhydrous ammonia in its closed-loop industrial ammonia refrigeration system. On October 2, 2018, EPA conducted an inspection of the Facility to determine whether Respondent was in compliance with…...
