Respiratory Protection

Counterfeit Filtering Facepiece Respirators are posing an additional Risk to Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic (American Journal of Infection Control)

Several cases of counterfeiting have already been reported. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has listed out some suspect characteristics of counterfeit respirators. Table 1 below summarizes the main suspect characteristics of counterfeit compared to appropriate FFR.  Among the suspect features, there are ear loops designs, the absence of markings or references to…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Counterfeit Filtering Facepiece Respirators are posing an additional Risk to Healthcare Workers during COVID-19 Pandemic (American Journal of Infection Control) Read More »

OSHA Expands Temporary Guidance for Respirator Fit-Testing to All Industries during COVID-19 Pandemic

OSHA has expanded temporary guidance provided in a March 14, 2020, memorandum regarding supply shortages of N95s or other filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This expanded guidance applies to all workplaces covered by OSHA where there is required respirator use. OSHA field offices will exercise enforcement discretion concerning annual fit-testing requirements,…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA Expands Temporary Guidance for Respirator Fit-Testing to All Industries during COVID-19 Pandemic Read More »

Expanded Temporary Enforcement Guidance on Respiratory Protection Fit-Testing for N95 Filtering Facepieces in ALL Industries During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

This memorandum expands temporary enforcement guidance provided in OSHA’s March 14, 2020, memorandum to Compliance Safety and Health Officers for enforcing annual fit-testing requirements of the Respiratory Protection standard, 29 CFR § 1910.134(f)(2), with regard to supply shortages of N95s or other filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs) due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.[1] The March…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Expanded Temporary Enforcement Guidance on Respiratory Protection Fit-Testing for N95 Filtering Facepieces in ALL Industries During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Read More »

OSHA issues Regional Memo on Enforcement Guidance for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment Certified under Standards of Other Countries or Jurisdictions During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

MEMORANDUM FOR: REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS, STATE PLAN DESIGNEES THROUGH: AMANDA EDENS, Deputy Assistant Secretary FROM: PATRICK J. KAPUST, Acting Director Directorate of Enforcement Programs SUBJECT: Enforcement Guidance for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment Certified under Standards of Other Countries or Jurisdictions During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic   This memorandum provides interim guidance to Compliance…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA issues Regional Memo on Enforcement Guidance for Use of Respiratory Protection Equipment Certified under Standards of Other Countries or Jurisdictions During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic Read More »

Air-Line respirator with Auxiliary bottle has an APF of 1,000 or 10,000?

So what is the Assigned-Protection Factor (APF) for an air-line respirator, commonly used inside PRCSs which has, or has the potential to have an IDLH atmosphere?  Is it 1,000 or 10,000?  I have always been taught/trained that the simple air-line respirator (Pressure-demand/Positive pressure mode) WITHOUT the Auxilary/Back-up cylinder the APF is 1,000, but the addition…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Air-Line respirator with Auxiliary bottle has an APF of 1,000 or 10,000? Read More »

OSHA issues Willful for Respirator use associated with entering a PRCS

OSHA has dined a Delaware Rail Car Tank Cleaning And Repair Facility $371,276 for Safety and Health Hazards.  This same company, different location, was cited last year after a PRCS fatality inside a Rail Car (PRCS fatality cleaning a railcar (Oxygen Deficient and $551K): Membership Content).   This inspection was initiated due to a complaint, but surely…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA issues Willful for Respirator use associated with entering a PRCS Read More »

OSHA answers questions regarding Escape-ONLY respirators (2019 LOI)

Background: The employer has truck drivers that drive in and out of oil/gas refineries. Drivers are provided with a North 7900 series air-purifying disposable mouthpiece type respirator for use as an escape-only respirator. The owner’s manual to the North 7900 Series disposable mouthpiece type escape respirator warns employers to be aware of any physical limitations or…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA answers questions regarding Escape-ONLY respirators (2019 LOI) Read More »

A sign you may need a new LHCP for your Respirator Medical Evaluations!

A client got dinged on an audit because they were not having their employees medically evaluated before being provided a respirator.  They contacted their local medical facility to seek help with this and of course, the facility said they could do the medical evaluation.  This morning I received their first batch for me to sign-off…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

A sign you may need a new LHCP for your Respirator Medical Evaluations! Read More »

Respiratory Protection Program and Records Retention

For those of you who are SAFTENG members and manage a Respiratory Protection program, this is NOT news to you, as we have discussed this many times before, and if you have been to my 1.5 Day Respiratory Protection Administrator course, you got this beat into your head!  But for those less fortunate, here is…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Respiratory Protection Program and Records Retention Read More »

OSHA clarifies positions on “Voluntary Respirator Use”

Question 1: If an employer pays for and allows respirators to be worn on a voluntary basis when respiratory protection is not required to meet any OSHA standard, is it then regarded as though the employer is mandating the use of the respirators?… Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA clarifies positions on “Voluntary Respirator Use” Read More »

OSHA issues Enforcement Policy for Respiratory Hazards Not Covered by OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits

Nov 02, 2018 MEMORANDUM FOR: REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS FROM: KIMBERLY STILLE, Acting Director Directorate of Enforcement Programs SUBJECT:  Enforcement Policy for Respiratory Hazards Not Covered by OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits As you are aware, Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) is occasionally used to cite respiratory hazards from exposure to an air contaminant…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA issues Enforcement Policy for Respiratory Hazards Not Covered by OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits Read More »

OSHA clarifies that a medical eval is REQUIRED for voluntary use of a negative pressure (tight-fitting) respirators

OSHA recently posted a Letter of Interpretation where they reference their Compliance Directive, Inspection Procedures for the Respiratory Protection Standard, CPL 02-00-158, and the standard’s preamble in establishing the medical evaluations for “voluntary use” of negative pressure (tight-fitting) respirators.  This issue has been made clear in the CPL for years, but I thought I would share the LOI…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA clarifies that a medical eval is REQUIRED for voluntary use of a negative pressure (tight-fitting) respirators Read More »

Scroll to Top