Respiratory Protection

Step 1: If your only respirator use is for escape, skip to Step 8 to select the appropriate respirator.   Step 2: If the respiratory hazard is a biological aerosol, such as TB (tuberculosis), anthrax, psittacosis (parrot fever), or hanta virus, select a respirator appropriate for non-emergency activities recognized to present a health risk to […]

In OSHA’s fiscal year 2018 the agency performed 1,154 Respiratory Protection Inspections, resulting in 2,599 citations worth $3,228,420.  The top 5 industries accounted for 176 of these inspections, 460 citations, and $377,748 in penalties. Total for all industries and the Top 5 industries shown in the table below. Also, below is a breakdown of all 2018

Nov 02, 2018 MEMORANDUM FOR: REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS FROM:  KIMBERLY STILLE, Acting Director Directorate of Enforcement Programs SUBJECT: Enforcement Policy for Respiratory Hazards Not Covered by OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits As you are aware, Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) is occasionally used to cite respiratory hazards from exposure to an air contaminant that is

Many program administrators already know that OSHA does not require that medical evaluations be done annually, and many companies take full advantage of this. But all too often, we come across employees wearing respirators that were never medically evaluated and cleared by the PLHCP to wear in the workplace. Here is how this happens…

As safety departments get squeezed for $, we are seeing a spike in a severe deficiency in a site’s respiratory protection training.  I first got wind of this when a client I was scheduled to do some respiratory protection training for canceled the course.  This is a client we provide other services for, so while

Nationwide, approximately 1.3 million workplaces provide at least a portion of their employees with respiratory protection. One of the most common types of respiratory protection is the filtering facepiece respirator (FFR), which is designed to be discarded when it becomes unsuitable for further use due to considerations of hygiene, excessive resistance, or physical damage. However,

On February 3, 2017, at approximately 5:57 p.m. an employee was working in the crawl space of Tower B to unclog food sink drains underneath the facility’s kitchen. Workers were working in a confined space in Mechanical Room Number 5. They were tasked to unclog four food drains, which were located 50 to 60 feet

Escape respirators have a SINGLE function: to allow a person working in a normally safe environment sufficient time to escape from suddenly occurring respiratory hazards. Given this function, selection does not rely on assigned protection factors.  Instead, these respirators are selected based on: a consideration of the time needed to escape, and the likelihood of IDLH or oxygen

Employers may provide ESCAPE-ONLY respirators to those whose ONLY action is to leave the area immediately and take NO part in the response. Escape-only respirators MUST be NIOSH-approved and appropriate for the potential airborne concentration and class of substances specified in the employer’s hazard determination (1910.134(d)). Emergency escape-only respirators must be inspected BEFORE being carried

A fairly common mistake we see at facilities that have their own emergency response teams is that the responders are NOT receiving a fitness-for-duty evaluation and only receiving the same medical evaluation as those who wear respirators in non-emergency settings.  This is a problem, as OSHA has stated that emergency responders need more than the