Enforcement of minimum approach distance requirements in 29 CFR 1910.269 and 29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart V

On April 11, 2014, OSHA promulgated a final rule revising the general industry and construction standards for work on electric power generation, transmission and distribution installations. On February 13, 2015, OSHA entered into a settlement agreement with the Edison Electric Institute, the Utility Line Clearance Coalition, and the Tree Care Industry Association resolving legal challenges to that final rule. As part of that settlement, OSHA issued a memorandum (dated February 18, 2015) with the subject line “29 CFR 1910.269 and 29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart V-Enforcement dates.” The memorandum adopted a delayed enforcement date for certain minimum approach distance requirements in 29 CFR 1910.269 and 29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart V. On January 20, 2016, OSHA issued a second memorandum (subject line, “29 CFR 1910.269 and 29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart V-Enforcement dates for minimum approach distances”) further delaying enforcment of those requirements. This memorandum further extends those enforcement dates as follows:

Until June 30, 2017, for voltages of 169.1 kilovolts and more: (i) no citations will be issued under 29 CFR 1910.269(l)(3)(ii) or 29 CFR 1926.960(c)(1)(ii), which require the employer to determine the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage; and (ii) OSHA will accept compliance with the minimum approach distances in Table 6 or Tables 10 to 13 in Appendix B to 29 CFR 1910.269 as compliance with 29 CFR 1910.269(l)(3)(i) and 29 CFR 1926.960(c)(1)(i).

Until June 30, 2017, for voltages of 72.6 to 169.0 kilovolts, no citations will be issued under 29 CFR 1910.269(l)(3)(ii) or 29 CFR 1926.960(c)(1)(ii), which require the employer to determine the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, provided the employer assumes a maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, of 3.0 per unit.

OSHA does not expect to further extend these enforcement dates. OSHA is adopting the following policy for enforcement of the minimum approach distance requirements in 29 CFR 1910.269 and 29 CFR 1926.960 beginning on July 1, 2017:

For voltages over 72.5 kilovolts, 29 CFR 1910.269(l)(3)(ii) and 29 CFR 1926.960(c)(1)(ii) require the employer to determine the maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase to ground, through an engineering analysis or assume a maximum anticipated per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, in accordance with Table R-9 or Table V-8, respectively. On September 12, 2016, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) presented a paper titled, “Practical Approaches to Reducing Transient Overvoltage Factors for Live Work” at its ESMO 2016 conference in Columbus, OH. That paper describes practices that can be adopted1 to reduce maximum transient overvoltages to “industry-accepted values” given in IEEE 516-20092 and shown in the following table:

Table A–Industry Accepted Values of Maximum Per-Unit Transient Overvoltage

Voltage Range (kV) Maximum per-unity transient
overvoltage, phase-to-ground
72.6 to 362 3.0
363 to 550 2.4
551 to 800 2.0

The IEEE committee responsible for developing this paper performed research to determine, based on sound engineering principles, what practices are necessary to limit transient overvoltages on electric power systems operating at over 72.5 kilovolts. As a result of this research, the committee developed recommendations that, if followed, limit maximum transient overvoltages to the values listed in Table A. OSHA has concluded that the paper constitutes an engineering analysis of electric power systems operating at over 72.5 kilovolts and that employers can follow the guidance in the paper to comply with 29 CFR 1910.269(l)(3)(ii) and 29 CFR 1926.960(c)(1)(ii). Consequently, for voltages exceeding 72.5 kilovolts, OSHA will accept compliance with minimum approach distances calculated in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.269 Table R-3 or 29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart V, Table V-2, as applicable, using values of maximum per-unit transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, as listed in Table A of this memorandum provided all of the following conditions are in place:

  • The employer responsible for the circuit on which employees are working selects and maintains circuit breakers to minimize the probability of circuit breaker restrike;
  • Live-line work is not performed while lightning is visible at the worksite;
  • Reclosing is blocked on the circuit on which employees are working;
  • Line switching is not performed on the circuit on which employees are working;
  • Capacitor switching is disabled on the circuit on which employees are working; and
  • When the work is on a line operating at 550.1 to 800.0 kilovolts, nominal, the line length is limited to 322 kilometers (200 miles).

Table B lists minimum approach distances calculated in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.269 Table R-3 and 29 CFR Part 1926, Subpart V, Table V-2 using values for maximum transient overvoltage, phase-to-ground, from Table A.3 Employers may use the minimum approach distances in Table B, provided the conditions listed in this memorandum apply and the employer follows the notes to that table. Employers that do not meet these conditions must establish minimum approach distances in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.269(l)(3) or 29 CFR 1926.960(c)(1), as applicable.

Table B—Alternative Minimum Approach Distances for Voltages of More Than 72.5 kV *  
Voltage Range,
Phase-to-Phase
(kV)
Phase-to-Ground Exposure Phase-to-Phase Exposure
m ft (ft, in **) m ft (ft, in )
72.6 to 121.0 1.02 3.3 (3 ft, 4 in) 1.27 4.2 (4 ft, 3 in)
121.1 to 145.0 1.16 3.8 (3 ft, 10 in) 1.46 4.8 (4 ft, 10 in)
145.1 to 169.0 1.30 4.3 (4 ft, 4 in) 1.65 5.4 (5 ft, 5 in)
169.1 to 242.0 1.72 5.6 (5 ft, 8 in) 2.55 8.4 (8 ft, 5 in)
242.1 to 362.0 2.76 9.1 (9 ft, 2 in) 4.49 14.7 (14 ft, 9 in)
362.1 to 420.0 2.50 8.2 (8 ft, 3 in) 4.17 13.7 (13 ft, 9 in)
420.1 to 550.0 3.62 11.9 (11 ft, 11 in) 6.18 20.3 (20 ft, 4 in)
550.1 to 800.0 4.83 15.8 (15 ft, 10 in) 8.47 27.8 (27 ft, 10 in)

Scenario: Some equipment manufacturers believe that all equipment used in combustible dust atmospheres, including non-electrically powered vacuum cleaners, requires NRTL listing/approval.

Question: Could OSHA clarify the NRTL listing/approval requirements for non-electrical vacuum cleaners used in combustible dust atmospheres?

Response: Currently, no NRTL is recognized to certify non-electric vacuums for hazardous locations. Generally, non-electrical vacuums used in any hazardous (classified) locations, must meet the applicable manufacturer’s listing and labeling requirements. OSHA only recognizes certification and testing by NRTLs. A list of currently recognized NRTLs and the scope of NRTL recognition can be viewed at this site: https://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/.

OSHA’s requirements for hazardous (classified) locations are in 29 CFR 1910.307, and those requirements are only for electrical and electronic equipment and wiring in hazardous (classified) locations. OSHA standards are similar to NFPA standards for equipment used in classified locations. Therefore, OSHA requires equipment used in any hazardous (classified) location to be rated for the location by Class, Zone, Division, and/or Group, as necessary.

Scroll to Top