Error Probabilities (Reason Model)

Assigning probability values to errors is still very much an art form.  Nonetheless, there is sufficient general agreement about the likelihood of errors occurring in various generic tasks to put them into sensible rank order. Their main use is to provide benchmarks for the range of error probabilities over different jobs.
Here is a list of several well-researched error-enforcing conditions (EEC). For each one, there are the following:

  • Description: a general description
  • Risk factor: a number (x10) representing the approximate amount by which the nominal error probability will increase when someone encounters this EEC initially (the error probability cannot exceed 1.00)
  • Error type: the most likely types where these can be predicted on psychological grounds. The conditions are listed in order of severity, beginning with the most provocative conditions.

 

   Error-Producing Situations
 Category  Context  Risk Factor
Type
Unfamiliarity A novel and potentially dangerous situation  17 KB Mistake
Time shortage Time available for error detection or correction  11 All Types
Noisy Signals Low signal-to-noise ratio in communications between groups 10 Misperception
Poor interface Equipment fails to communicate vital signals or conflicting controls  8 Action Slips
Designer/User
mismatch
Equipment conflicts with the user’s model of the world  8 All Types
Irreversibility Unforgiving equipment items can’t correct actions  8 All Types
Overload Too much information was badly presented 6 Perceptual
slips
Technique
unlearning
need to apply a new technique having reversed action 6 strong habit
intrusions
Knowledge
transfer
Need to transfer knowledge from task to task without loss 5 strong habit
intrusions
misperception
of risk
Mismatch between real and perceived risk 4 Mistakes
Inexperience Training or inexperience insufficient 3 Mistakes
Checking Little or no checking of job done 3 Undetected
errors
Culture macho culture, dangerous procedures 2 Accident
Morale morale low, loss of faith in leaders 1.2 Sloppiness
Monotony Boredom, repetitious tasks 1.1 Unvigilant
External Pacing Pressure of supervisors 1.06 Slips

 

 

   ERROR-ENFORCING CONDITIONS AND THEIR RELATIVE EFFECTS
  Generic Task  Nominal Error Probability
 1  Carrying out a totally novel task with no real idea of the likely consequences.  0.75 (0.50–1.00)
2  Attempting to repair a fairly complex system on a single attempt without direct procedures or the procedures to hand.  0.30 (0.20–0.30)
3 Performing a complex task requiring a high degree of knowledge and skill.  0.20 (0.10–0.35)
4 Performing a moderately simple task quickly and with scant attention.  0.10 (0.06–0.28)
5 Restoring a piece of fairly complex equipment to its original state following maintenance.  0.007 (0.0008–0.010)
6 A highly familiar routine task performed by a well-motivated and competent workforce.  0.0005 (0.00008–0.0010)
Scroll to Top