Hazards of hydrofluoric acid (HF) – Line Break gone bad

On April 15, 2014, Employee #1, a maintenance technician employed by Solarworld Industries America Inc., and Coworker #1, a tool operator in the plant’s fabrication area, were working at the employer’s solar cell manufacturing facility. Coworker #1 had submitted a work order to repair a leak of liquid hydrofluoric acid (HF). HF is used in the manufacture of solar cells in a process similar to that for making semiconductor wafers.

The acid runs through double-contained plastic pipes that travel through a maintenance tunnel under the production floor, referred to as the Sub-Fab. There are low point drain boxes (liquid traps) at various points in the system to enclose valves. These drain boxes have sensors connected to alarms. A leak sensor on one of the low point drain boxes (#3CVB-310-2-6) in the Sub-Fab alerted Coworker #1 to a leak in the HF piping system. Coworker # 1 tracked the leak and submitted a work order for the needed repair. Employee #1 arrived to perform the repair. Coworker #1 led Employee #1 to the leaking drain box and then moved out of the way. Employee #1 attempted to tighten the fittings on the valves within the drain box. He determined that the threads were stripped on one of the fittings. As Employee #1 tightened the fitting, acid sprayed out, some spraying onto his face shield and one of his gloves. Employee #1 was not wearing a respirator, and he stated that he could taste the acid, which would suggest that some of the acid sprayed under his face shield. Coworker #1 was standing far enough away that he avoided contact with the spray. Employee #1 exited the area and removed his gloves. He had no noticeable skin burns on his hands or face and no other symptoms. However, several hours later, delayed symptoms commenced. Employee #1 began vomiting and experiencing respiratory irritation and distress. Emergency services were called, and Employee #1 was transported to the hospital, where he was admitted and treated for systemic chemical poisoning. He remained hospitalized for several days. This event was investigated by Oregon OSHA.

 

OSHA CASE File

 

Scroll to Top