CLICK HERE to Renew your Membership
CLICK HERE for a NEW Membership
CLICK HERE to see eligibility requirements for FREE Membership
If you have any questions, please contact me
I am proud to announce that SAFTENG and The Chlorine Institute have renewed our partnership for another year (through 2026). Members of The Chlorine Institute receive a FREE SAFTENG membership. If you qualify, please contact me
NOTE: Any trade group interested in becoming a partner with SAFTENG for your Member Companies, please reach out, and I can share the plan
SAFTENG has:
- Over 19,000 categorized unsafe acts/conditions and accident/injury photos
- Over 1,500 ppt's & doc's in the SAFTENG Library
- Over 5,000 Technical Articles on Process Safety, Emergency Response & OSH topics
- Over 450 videos (those not allowed on YouTube Channel)
Many THANKS to my NEW Members and those who CONTINUE to support SAFTENG:
For those who live within the process safety bubble, you know all about the MOC “requirements” from OSHA and EPA process safety standards. However, an MOC program is vital to any formal Safety Management System. And you would be correct to say “OSHA (nor EPA) does not require one outside a PSM/RMP standards. But after a busy year helping clients with both traditional...
Read More
One of my all time favorite RAGAGEPs is the Compressed Gas Association’s (CGA) 2.1 for those who handle anhydrous ammonia. This year, they published the 7th Edition, and they made it even better. Unlike so many RAGAGEPs, the CGA embraced the practice of “Continuous improvement” and really did a nice job with their additional explanations of their existing requirements. ...
Read More
This is a really good case to read. It involves light-curtains and lasers as “guarding” and the fact that they were not functioning. One of the machines had broken a manager’s foot when he/she entered to troubleshoot a problem (LOTO citation). The facility had put tape on the floor as an indicator rather than fixing the guarding. The Willful citation was due...
Read More
The men were helping to build a new sewage pumping facility. They were in a concrete foundation, a trench-like part of the structure about 40 feet deep. Sources said giant intakes five feet in diameter are inside the structure. Inflatable plugs secured with chains are used to keep the water out. Some sort of catastrophic failure immediately sent sewage water into the space where the men were working...
Read More
This material is from the United States Coast Guard (USCG) and is an EXCELLENT explanation of the required electrical markings/labels on tools/equipment used within a Hazardous Location.
Simply put, if the tool/equipment is NOT marked/labeled for use in the specific HAZLOC, it can NOT be brought into the HAZLOC.
…
HomeRead More »
Read More
On May 15, 2021, an incident resulted in the fatality of an offshore worker when two production personnel were pressure testing a 16-inch well surface casing and anexplosion occurred. The explosion entailed a high-pressure release with no signs of ignition. Information obtained by BSEE during the subsequent investigation determined that personnel were using a high-pressure well to supply the...
Read More
Respondent has a liquid natural gas pretreatment process at the Facility, meeting the definition of ” process” as defined by 40 C.F.R. § 68.3. Respondent receives natural gas by pipeline and pretreats the natural gas to remove carbon dioxide, sulfur compounds, water, mercury, and heavy hydrocarbons. The regulated substance under 40 C.F.R. Part 68 Chemical Accident RMP regulations is Natural...
Read More
Respondent is the owner and operator of an oil refinery. On September 9-13, 2019, the EPA inspected the Facility to determine compliance with 40 C.F.R. part 68. Based on the observations of the EPA inspectors at the inspection, the EPA has determined that Respondent uses, handles, and/or stores more than the threshold quantity of Flammable Mixture, Hydrogen flouride/Hydrofluoric acid, Butane, Isobutane,...
Read More
First, I am not fully bought into the “psychological safety” concept. For me, it is just how we should manage safety, so I am not a “labels” kind of safety pro. However, I get a lot of questions about HOP and Psychological Safety, and the one place we could begin to utilize these approaches is in our “annual periodic LOTO inspections.” Let me explain…...
Read More
On New Year’s Eve, I hope many safety pros will choose a 2024 resolution to end the regurgitation of OSHA standards as their “written programs.” I have always used the OSHA standard as my baseline, but these programs need to EXPLAIN HOW the facility will meet the requirements – not repeat the requirements. For example…
I hope we can move on from simply cutting and pasting...
Read More
One thing that many find confusing regarding the control of hazardous energy is the actual hazard they are trying to render to a Zero Energy State (ZES). This is a simple concept, but many get it wrong in their programs and machine-specific procedures. Let’s take compressed air as an example. Many compressed air systems in manufacturing facilities will operate around 120 psi. ...
Read More
What happened?
The extinguisher, rated to 2900 psi was being tested to a pressure of 4351 psi.
The incident occurred when the test pressure reached 2842 psi.
The extinguisher was 13 years old. No one was harmed.
The failure occurred under test conditions, and no personnel were nearby to be injured.
The hydrostatic test was a scheduled 5-year test carried out as per the company’s planned...
Read More
Partner Organizations
Member Associations
