CLICK HERE to Renew your Membership
CLICK HERE for a NEW Membership
CLICK HERE to see eligibility requirements for FREE Membership
If you have any questions, please contact me
I am proud to announce that SAFTENG and The Chlorine Institute have renewed our partnership for another year (through 2026). Members of The Chlorine Institute receive a FREE SAFTENG membership. If you qualify, please contact me
NOTE: Any trade group interested in becoming a partner with SAFTENG for your Member Companies, please reach out, and I can share the plan
SAFTENG has:
- Over 19,000 categorized unsafe acts/conditions and accident/injury photos
- Over 1,500 ppt's & doc's in the SAFTENG Library
- Over 5,000 Technical Articles on Process Safety, Emergency Response & OSH topics
- Over 450 videos (those not allowed on YouTube Channel)
Many THANKS to my NEW Members and those who CONTINUE to support SAFTENG:
Having had the privilege of working with a railroad this year, I have learned a lot about how “safety” functions in an industry sector I knew absolutely nothing about. But in this time, I have come to really like the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) approach to managing safety across this industry. The FRA had to pass a rule to meet a mandate from the Rail Safety...
Read More
Today I got one of my favorite magazines, of which I have been suggesting everyone in the PSM arena subscribe to (for FREE) – The BULLETIN from the National Board. And in this edition, the NB has an article on the Hanson RV that has an indicator telling when the valve has been activated. These are a really nice addition to any process safety efforts, but in the NH3 refrigeration...
Read More
Respondent operates a petrochemical manufacturing process at the Facility, utilizing regulated substances to produce vinyl chloride monomer, meeting the definition of ” process”, as defined by 40 C.F.R. § 68.3. Sulfur dioxide, hydrogen chloride, vinyl chloride and propylene (collectively, “regulated substances”) are each a “regulated substance” pursuant to 40 C.F.R....
Read More
Respondent is the owner and/or operator of a Brewery and has registered an RMPlan with the EPA for its Facility and has developed an RMProgram accidental release prevention program for the Facility. At its Facility:
Respondent operates an ammonia refrigeration plant.
Respondent has on-site for use, 160,300 pounds of anhydrous ammonia.
Respondent has one RMProgram level 3 covered process, which...
Read More
WTH? Did Haywood just say that? Yep – I am afraid I did and I mean it. Now my personal actions do not reflect that belief, as I am a safety professional and I want every decision you make to be one based on YOUR SAFETY. But as a business, safety can never be #1! We need to strive to make safety EQUAL TO the other core business functions such as production. ...
Read More
Buzz words… oh how I have come to hate them. In my earlier days in this profession, it was called “flavor of the month safety” as we had some catchphrase or “program” we’d implement to try and break through the “mental fog” that caused workers to work unsafely. Then came along the “silver bullet of safety” called Behavior-Based...
Read More
We do a lot of work in flammable atmospheres so yes we have rather high standards for what “minimal compliance” looks like. We recently came across this situation while performing an assessment for a facility that has suffered from a flash fire months earlier. During our walk-thru of the area (they knew we were coming) we walked upon this situation. As I stopped and began...
Read More
Both 1910.178 and 1910.147 have requirements that we periodically evaluate employees’ performance in their ability to perform LOTO and drive PITs in the manner in which they were trained. As I have discussed many times, just doing annual LOTO training without some type of “field verification” that the authorized employees are functioning within the program’s confines is...
Read More
First, let me say this article was written for those who do NOT live in the world of process safety, but yet they do have hazardous materials on-site in some type of bulk system, albeit below the PSM/RMP thresholds. In this posting, I am going to use Propane/LPG as my HAZMAT as there are many facilities that have this chemical on-site, even above the PSM/RMP TQs, but are exempt as it is used...
Read More
The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Air Pollution Control (DAPC) has adopted amended rules in Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) Chapter 3745-104, “Accidental Releases Prevention Program” Rules. The rules in this chapter establish Ohio’s Accidental Release Prevention Program. These rules were promulgated after Ohio received the delegation of authority from USEPA in December...
Read More
Respondent owned and operated a petroleum refinery with the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 2911. The Facility produces, processes, stores, or handles more than the threshold quantities of flammable and toxic substances identified in 40 C.F.R. § 68.130. The regulated flammable substances that are held above the threshold quantities identified in 40 C.F.R. § 68.130 and associated with...
Read More
Respondent is the owner and operator of a facility that has five inorganic chemical manufacturing processes, meeting the definition of “process”, as defined by 40 C.F.R. § 68.3. Bromine, ammonia (anhydrous), chlorine, sulfur trioxide, propylene oxide, oleum (fuming sulfuric acid), and sulfur dioxide (anhydrous) are each a “regulated substance” pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 68.3. Respondent...
Read More
Partner Organizations
Member Associations
