Â
CLICK HERE to Renew your Membership
CLICK HERE for a NEW Membership
CLICK HERE to see eligibility requirements for FREE Membership
If you have any questions, please contact me
I am proud to announce that SAFTENG and The Chlorine Institute have renewed our partnership for another year (through 2026). Members of The Chlorine Institute receive a FREE SAFTENG membership. If you qualify, please contact me
NOTE: Any trade group interested in becoming a partner with SAFTENG for your Member Companies, please reach out, and I can share the plan
SAFTENG has:
- Over 19,000 categorized unsafe acts/conditions and accident/injury photos
- Over 1,500 ppt's & doc's in the SAFTENG Library
- Over 5,000 Technical Articles on Process Safety, Emergency Response & OSH topics
- Over 450 videos (those not allowed on YouTube Channel)
Many THANKS to my NEW Members and those who CONTINUE to support SAFTENG:
August 17, 2017
Respondent owns and operates a petrochemical facility which manufactures specialty chemicals in a variety of operating units. Respondent produces, processes, handles, or stores one or more regulated substances listed in 40 C.F.R. Part 68 above the threshold quantity. In April 2016, Respondent began work to replace a tube exchanger on the Petro I unit. The replacement tube exchanger was fabricated...
Read More
August 17, 2017
OSHA opened an inspection of the mill on Dec. 27, 2016, in response to a complaint alleging unsafe working conditions. Inspectors discovered employees exposed to serious safety hazards, including permit-required confined space hazards and LOTO failures, which I have summarized below:
…
HomeRead More »
Read More
August 15, 2017
Both OSHA’s and EPA’s process safety standards require operating procedures to contain the “steps required to correct or avoid deviation(s)”, but what exactly does this mean? I really wish OSHA/EPA would have phrased it as “avoid or correct” as putting the words in this order is actual reality. Let’s look at a simple process set-up where the process has...
Read More
August 15, 2017
UPDATED 8/15/2017 with OSHA Case info: This has now been classified as a “Hot Gas Defrost Valving Error”.
On September 11, 2012, Employee #1, a temporary employee was working as a racker-blender at the [wine company], was exposed to anhydrous ammonia, and died of asphyxia. Employee #1 was found in the west hallway 54 ft from the men’s restroom. Upon further investigation, a...
Read More
August 15, 2017
FAQ Number: 1784
Date Published: August 04, 2017
Question: Does a facility have to count theft/diversion chemicals of interest in transportation packaging towards the screening threshold quantity if the packaging is on or attached to motive power to include overnight?
Answer: Yes. 6 CFR Part 27.203(c) states that facilities must calculate theft/diversion chemicals of interest in transportation...
Read More
August 14, 2017
Flaring took place over several days at a bulk propane plant after an unidentified third-party carrier, who is used to haul propane to the site, inadvertently offloaded anhydrous ammonia into propane storage tanks at the site. “It was a driver error on their end, and ultimately there was anhydrous that was in the storage tank in the truck that was delivered into ours”. There...
Read More
August 14, 2017
This week we learned of a lawsuit in KS regarding the location of a proposed (actually permitted) cold storage facility. Landowners near the facility have filed suit asking a judge to reverse the county commission’s approval of the 411,000 square feet cold-storage facility near their homes. Neighbors say the plan doesn’t provide the right setbacks or enough screening from the plant....
Read More
August 14, 2017
This posting includes some very interesting citations issued by EPA (not OSHA). For example, EPA took issue with using “pink ribbons” on valves being used in an energy isolation for contractors installing a piece of equipment – rather than LOTO locks or tags! This “ribbon” idea is still fairly prevalent in the refrigeration industry still today, as evident...
Read More
August 7, 2017
Just an FYI for those of you who have RMP covered processes in the state of NC. Not much different than what we see with federal inspection data, but there are some interesting differences none the less…
…
HomeRead More »
Read More
