CLICK HERE to Renew your Membership
CLICK HERE for a NEW Membership
CLICK HERE to see eligibility requirements for FREE Membership
If you have any questions, please contact me

I am proud to announce that SAFTENG and The Chlorine Institute have renewed our partnership for another year (through 2026).  Members of The Chlorine Institute receive a FREE SAFTENG membership.  If you qualify, please contact me

NOTE: Any trade group interested in becoming a partner with SAFTENG for your Member Companies, please reach out, and I can share the plan

SAFTENG has:

Many THANKS to my NEW Members and those who CONTINUE to support SAFTENG:

Since 2012
Since 2025
Since 2010
Since 2008
Since 2026
Since 2026
OneDigital | Resourcing Edge Since 2026
Since 2010
Since 2010
Since 2024
Since 2008
since 2012
Since 2024
Who must be notified of a release under Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)?
The notice required by section 304 of EPCRA is to be given by the owner or operator of a facility (by telephone, radio, or in person) immediately after the release of a CERCLA hazardous substance or of an EHS at or above the RQ. Notice is to be given to: … HomeRead More »
Read More
Can trucker drivers stay in their cab during the unloading of a flammable liquid?
We often get this question during audits and PHAs, as it seems to be “common practice” for the driver to reside inside their cab doing paperwork while they are the intended “hazmat attendant”. And although it may not be perfectly clear under DOT regulations (I think it is clear there as well, but many will argue otherwise) I turn to my favorite code, the International Fire...
Read More
Are hazardous chemicals present at rail yards subject to EPCRA 311/312?
Yes, hazardous chemicals present at rail yards are subject to EPCRA Sections 311 and 312, if they are NOT stored incident to transportation and they are present at the rail yard in amounts equal to or in excess of the minimum thresholds in 40 CFR 370.10(a). As explained in the answer to the question “are hazardous chemicals in transportation subject to EPCRA 311/312,” the Section 327 exemption for...
Read More
When to Revise OCA (EPA RMP FAQ)
The risk management program in 40 CFR Part 68 requires facilities to conduct an off-site consequence analysis (OCA) to provide information to state, local, and federal governments and the public about the potential consequences of an accidental chemical release. When does a facility need to revise its OCA? … HomeRead More »
Read More
Quantity of a regulated substance in an aqueous solution (EPA RMP FAQ)
When using RMP*Comp to conduct an offsite consequence analysis (OCA), a facility must specify the quantity released. What quantity should be entered for a regulated toxic substance in an aqueous solution, the total quantity of the aqueous solution or just the quantity of the toxic substance? … HomeRead More »
Read More
No trespassing signs restricted access onsite or offsite public receptor (EPA RMP FAQ)
The definition of public receptor is “offsite residences, institutions (e.g., schools, hospitals), industrial, commercial, and office buildings, parks, or recreational areas inhabited or occupied by the public at any time without restriction by the stationary source …” Offsite is further defined to include “areas within the property boundary [of the stationary source] to which...
Read More
Must I anticipate a specific cause for the worst-case scenario for a toxic substance? (EPA RMP FAQ)
When analyzing the worst-case scenario for regulated toxic substances, must I anticipate a specific cause (e.g., fire, explosion, etc.) of the scenario? … HomeRead More »
Read More
Identifying public receptors and property with restricted access (EPA RMP FAQ)
Does public receptor cover only buildings on a property or the entire property? If the owner of the land next to my site restricts access to the land, is it still a public receptor? … HomeRead More »
Read More
Flammable event with different time duration (EPA RMP FAQ)
What if a flammable event has a different time duration than the 5 kw/m2 for 40 seconds? … HomeRead More »
Read More
Underground storage tank off-site impacts to groundwater, drinking water, or soil (EPA RMP FAQ)
For the worst-case and alternative release scenarios of an underground storage tank, should I consider any impact on groundwater, drinking water, or soil? … HomeRead More »
Read More
What is the definition of "off-site property damage?" (EPA RMP FAQ)
I am working on the five-year accident history portion of the hazard assessment under the RMP.  Section 68.42(a) tells me to include “all accidental releases from covered processes that resulted in deaths, injuries, or significant property damage on site, or known offsite deaths, injuries, evacuations, sheltering in place, property damage, or environmental damage.”  Is there a definition...
Read More
Accidental releases from non-covered processes (EPA RMP FAQ)
Should the owner or operator include accidental releases from processes containing listed substances below the threshold quantity in the five-year accident history required under the hazard assessment provisions of 40 CFR Part 68, Subpart B, and in the incident investigation requirements under 40 CFR Part 68, Subparts C and D? No. … HomeRead More »
Read More
1 57 58 59 60 61 755

Partner Organizations

Member Associations

Scroll to Top