CLICK HERE to Renew your Membership
CLICK HERE for a NEW Membership
CLICK HERE to see eligibility requirements for FREE Membership
If you have any questions, please contact me
I am proud to announce that SAFTENG and The Chlorine Institute have renewed our partnership for another year (through 2026). Members of The Chlorine Institute receive a FREE SAFTENG membership. If you qualify, please contact me
NOTE: Any trade group interested in becoming a partner with SAFTENG for your Member Companies, please reach out, and I can share the plan
SAFTENG has:
- Over 19,000 categorized unsafe acts/conditions and accident/injury photos
- Over 1,500 ppt's & doc's in the SAFTENG Library
- Over 5,000 Technical Articles on Process Safety, Emergency Response & OSH topics
- Over 450 videos (those not allowed on YouTube Channel)
Many THANKS to my NEW Members and those who CONTINUE to support SAFTENG:
Ever heard anyone say, “PSM and RMP are identical except for the off-site consequence requirements”? There are a lot of similarities between the two chemical safety regulations, but the two are very much different in more ways than just the “off-site consequence requirements.” Most similarities are between RMP “Program 3 Prevention Program” and OSHA’s PSM requirement; however, there are...
Read More
Toxic Chemicals Regulated under RMP that are also Regulated under PSM
[Alphabetical Order – 78 Substances]
Chemical Name
CAS No.
RMP Threshold Quantity (lbs.)
PSM Threshold Quantity (lbs.)
Acrolein [2-Propenal]
107-02-8
5,000
150
Acrylonitrile [2-Propenenitrile]
107-13-1
20,000
Not Regulated
Acrylyl chloride [2-Propenoyl chloride]
814-68-6
5,000
250
Allyl...
Read More
A “safety can” is an approved container of not more than 5-gallon (19 L) capacity having a spring-closing lid and spout cover so designed that it will relieve internal pressure whensubjected to fire exposure. Safety cans are commonly used where limited quantities of flammable and combustible liquids are required for manufacturing or research. The basicpurpose of a safety can is to...
Read More
The Massachusetts Department of Fire Services (DFS) has enacted the Hazardous Materials Processing regulation (527 CMR 33). The code was developed to help prevent the occurrence of incidents like the explosion in Leominster in 2005, the fire and explosion in Danvers in 2006 (see the CSB investigation), and the fire and explosion in Middleton in 2011 (see the OSHA citations) – all involving processes...
Read More
MANY THANKS to my NEW & RENEWING
“Partners in Safety”for their support!
since 2006
since 2007
since 2012
since 2006
since 2010
2012 Fatality Tracker
Electrical
11
(2011 = 81)
(2010 = 90)
(2009 = 100)
Forklift/Manlift
Mobile Equipment
8
(2011 = 84)
(2010 = 110)
(2009 = 88)
Mining
18
(2011 = 248)
(2010...
Read More
The cord and Plug "exclusive control" concept applies ONLY to electrical cord equipment - NOT valves
So this week my good friend “Jim” and I were talking about an “accepted practice” that has grown into an “industry practice” and how OSHA has definitely drawn the line on the “cord and plug” LOTO practice such that it does NOT include valves. This “practice” involves the concept of defining “exclusive control of an energy isolating...
Read More
This week’s photo is a bit different. It is from my archives and one I use in my Flammable Liquids training courses. For those of have attended my training courses or a PHA’s on a flammable liquids process have seen my video of a very similar “tank launching” incident. The picture shows what happens when a flammable liquid tank emergency relief system fails....
Read More
OSHA recognizes that in some situations, violations of certain standards which require the employer to have a written program to address a hazard, or to make a written certification (e.g., hazard communication, personal protective equipment, permit-required confined spaces, and others), are perceived to be “paperwork deficiencies” rather than critically important implementation problems....
Read More
Many THANKS to John Newquist, Assistant Regional Administrator at DOL-OSHA, for providing this presentation. Click Here to download (pdf)
Read More
In the USA, OSHA REQUIRES employers to “Fit Test” each worker who will wear a tight-fitting respirator. This includes all types of tight-fitting respirators, from half-face air purifying respirators to full-face supplied air respirators. The workers are also REQUIRED to be fit tested with EACH MAKE, MODEL STYLE and SIZE face piece they are medically qualified and trained...
Read More
It is pretty common for PSM/RMP facilities to have a windsock or two on-site. However, the condition of these devices ranges from brand new to a piece of wire sticking up in the wind. In this posting, I want to offer some tips on how we should manage our windsocks as a “piece of critical equipment”.
…
HomeRead More »
Read More
Partner Organizations
Member Associations
