Technical Analysis: The Risks of Pneumatic vs. Hydrostatic Testing

A catastrophic incident at an engineering facility serves as a definitive case study in the dangers of improper pressure testing. A technician suffered life-altering injuries when a 335-liter (88-gallon) vessel exploded during a pressure test.

The root cause was a fundamental failure in hazard control: the company opted to use compressed air (pneumatic testing) instead of water (hydrostatic testing) to verify the integrity of questionable weld joints.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top