We have been using OSHA’s Hazard Categories from the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) since 2012. I have written a lot about the flammable categories, but I tend to get a lot of questions about the Health Hazard Categories in my HAZCOM and HAZMAT training so I thought I would explain in real-world terms how toxic some chemicals are using the new GHS categories. In this article, I will cover the most common route of entry: Inhalation of GASES
Here is OSHA’s table showing the inhalation categories.
Table A.1.1—Acute Toxicity Hazard Categories and Acute Toxicity Estimate (ATE) Values Defining the Respective Categories
| Exposure route | Category 1 | Category 2 | Category 3 | Category 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inhalation—Gases (ppmV) | LC50 ≤ 100 | LC50 > 100 and ≤ 500 | LC50 > 500 and ≤ 2,500 | LC50 > 2,500 and ≤ 20,000 |
|
DANGER Skull and crossbones H330: Fatal if inhaled |
DANGER Skull and crossbones H330: Fatal if inhaled |
DANGER Skull and crossbones H331: Toxic if inhaled |
WARNING Exclamation point H332: Harmful if inhaled |
NOTE: under the GHS there are actually five (5) categories, but OSHA only adopted 1-4.
So what this table tells us that when a chemical has an inhalation hazard less than 100 ppm, it will be a Category 1 ACUTE TOXICITY (inhalation). They use Lethal Concentration-Fifty (LC50) to establish these levels (as I have depicted in the revised OSHA table above.
We can also use this information when we are using the International Fire Code (IFC) and we have “Toxic” and “Highly Toxic” materials.
|
TOXIC A chemical falling within any of the following categories: |
HIGHLY TOXIC A material which produces a lethal dose or lethal concentration which falls within any of the following categories: |
Here are some gases that would fall into the CAT 1 (what I commonly refer to as “Lethal Service”)
| Chemical name |
Chemical formula |
CAS number |
LC50 ppm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arsenic pentafluoride | AsF5 | 7784-36-3 | 20 |
| Arsine | AsH3 | 7784-42-1 | 20 |
| Diborane | B2H6 | 19287-45-7 | 80 |
| Dichloroacetylene | C2Cl2 | 7572-29-4 | 45.6 |
| Hydrogen cyanide | HCN | 74-90-8 | 40 |
| Hydrogen selenide | H2Se | 7783-07-5 | 2 |
| Oxygen difluoride | OF2 | 7783-41-7 | 2.6 |
| Perfluoroisobutylene | C4F8 | 382-21-8 | 1.2 |
| Phosgene | CCl2O | 75-44-5 | 5 |
| Phosphine | PH3 | 7803-51-2 | 22 |
| Selenium hexafluoride | SeF6 | 7783-79-1 | 50 |
| Stibine | H3Sb | 7803-52-3 | 20 |
| Sulfur tetrafluoride | SF4 | 7783-60-0 | 40 |
| Tellurium hexafluoride | TeF6 | 7783-80-4 | 25 |
You may notice that the two most common chemicals I write about often did not make the cut: Chlorine and Ammonia. And Chlorine and Ammonia are not slouches in the Hazard Categories – they just do not rise to the level of those in CAT 1.
Chlorine rates dangerous enough to be a CAT 2 ACUTE TOXICITY (inhalation) with an LC50 of 293 ppm, but some may be surprised to learn that Anhydrous Ammonia is only a CAT 4 ACUTE TOXICITY (inhalation) because it has an LC50 of 7,338 ppm.
This can best be seen in their IDLH values, where Chlorine has an IDLH of 10 ppm and Ammonia’s is 300 ppm.
But look what NH3 and Cl2 have for Skin and Eye hazards:
- SKIN CORROSION – Category 1
- SERIOUS EYE DAMAGE – Category 1
Chlorine
- SKIN CORROSION/IRRITATION – Category 1
- SERIOUS EYE DAMAGE – Category 1
For those wondering, if NH3 should be respected because it is a CAT 4 ACUTE TOXICITY (inhalation) – heck yes, it will kick some serious a_s!
One item that may be of interest to those in the process safety arena:
One of the chemicals that brought about OSHA’s PSM and EPA’s RMP standards and well as dozens of more PS standards around the world is Methyl Isocyanate (MIC). Which Category would MIC fall into?
MIC has an LC50 of 6.1 ppm, making it a CAT 1 ACUTE TOXICITY (inhalation)
