ASME B31.3 and Hydrostatic Relief Valves

These little safety devices cause such big troubles because of pure ignorance.  I continue to have silly debates with very smart people about meeting the absolute bare minimums from so many different recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEPs).  As of today, I have written about Hydrostatic Relief Valves 84 times. 

This week, I am back in my process safety saddle, helping a client with a release and a flash fire that seriously injured three (3) workers.  Had it not been for their FRC PPE program we implemented several years ago, this could have easily been a triple fatality.  Needless to say, I was confused when my old boss told me OSHA and EPA were asking a lot of questions and taking issues with the fact that the piping that failed did not have an HRV in place; however, the PSI RV data stated one was there, and the P&ID stated one was there AND the PHA listed the HRV for the “blocked in scenario.”  If you have ever wanted to see how OSHA issues Willful Citations, here is a perfect example. 

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top