Bryan Haywood

What to do when my RAGAGEPs conflict (CGA 2.1, 5.6.10 vs. B31.3, 345.5)

As we continue to “dumb down” RAGAGEPs to take away OSHA/EPA’s ability to cite fundamental engineering failures found in processes handling HHC/EHS, the issue of “conflicting requirements” continues to be troubling.  As my Anhydrous Ammonia clients learned firsthand last year, with the 7th edition of CGA 2.1, the RAGAGEP has some NEW requirements for pressure…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

New HAZMAT exemptions (2024 IFC)

The 2024 edition of the International Fire Code has a new “table” that lists several exemptions.  These exemptions come with some limitations, such as… Exempted materials and conditions listed in this table are required to comply with provisions of this code that are not based on exceeding maximum allowable quantities inSection 5003. Here are a…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

13 Brutal Truths Every Employer Needs to Know (Arpad Szakal, ACC)

This was NOT intended to be directed at safety, but damn, if we look at all 13 through the lens of “barriers to world-class safety,” they sure do resonate. I have bolded my Top 3; which are your Top 3? 13 Brutal Truths Every Employer Needs to Know:… Membership Required You must be a member...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Responding to “small releases”

Both OSHA and EPA require PSM/RMP facilities to include procedures for “responding to small releases” in their Emergency Action Plans 1910.119(n) Emergency planning and response The employer shall establish and implement an emergency action plan for the entire plant in accordance with the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.38. In addition, the emergency action plan shall…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

When management sends the message they are “serious” about safety

This is in my community, and I just had to share.   The back story is… Recently, a child was struck crossing the street at this intersection.  The child was “treated and released” at a local ER and will fully recover (Physically, mentally, not so sure).  Neighbors had been complaining to the police about the increased…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Understanding our LOPC Flammable and Toxic Risks

A loss of containment and subsequent release of fluids can cause adverse consequences (i.e., impact safety, health, and environment, cause production losses, andincur maintenance and reconstruction costs). The risk analysis should consider the nature of the hazards and ensure that appropriate factors are considered for the equipment items being assessed. Flammable Events (Fire and Explosion)…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA issues Car-Seal citations (Relief Protection System)

29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1) The employer shall develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information…. Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a member? Log in here...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

[My] Weekly Safety Thought – Give the traditional SMS a chance

I am never disappointed in social media’s ability to tell me daily just how bad traditional safety practices are. I am also wondering if there is an aspect of business management that gets beat up and denounced more than safety. It seems we are never without so many new options/directions in safety, and unfortunately, many…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Defining and Quantifying the term “Remote”

In process safety circles, the word “remote” is found in several codes/standards. In OSHA’s Process Safety Management standard, we find it used in the Normally Unoccupied and Remote Facility (NURF) exemption (1910.119(a)(2)(iii). OSHA did us a favor by officially defining this phrase; however, they have never QUANTIFIED it. Normally unoccupied remote facility means a facility…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA issues RMP & EPCRA citations @ food facility (NH3 & $229K w/ $179K SEP)

Respondent owns and operates a cheese manufacturing facility. On March 22, 2022, EPA performed an inspection of the Facility to evaluate compliance with CERCLA Section 103, EPCRA Sections 304-312, and CAA Section 112(r). Based upon the information gathered during the Inspection and subsequent investigation, EPA determined that Respondent violated certain provisions of CERCLA, EPCRA, and…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

It happened again… coworker turns on machine that a worker was “trouble-shooting”

On August 23, 2023, an employee was troubleshooting an unscrambler machine malfunction. The employee walked around to the bottom of the support frame of the machine, near two parallel drive chains. A coworker restarted the machine, and the employee was pulled into the machine by the drive chains. The employee was killed. Source: https://www.osha.gov/ords/imis/establishment.inspection_detail?id=1693870.015… Membership...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top