I can not think of a single business that operated and maintained a PSM/RMP-covered process that did not utilize LOCTITE®. It is a beautiful product; however, it may be the most overused and abused product within the covered process. When used PROPERLY and per Henkel’s instructions, the product works well. But like most really good […]
This Instruction STD from MI-OSHA is too good not to share with those who deal with 1910.106(e) and their flammable liquids safety efforts. It does a nice job comparing the 1910.106 (which is based on the 1968 edition of NFPA 30) with the current NFPA 30 standard.
You know businesses are cutting costs when I get this question. But it is a good question as we have come across “reclaimed piping” being used in a lesser-degree hazard (e.g., flammable gas to flammable liquid) process. I personally never experienced this practice in my time in industry, but it has become more popular as
If you have followed me for years, you know I love to use the International Fire Code over outdated OSHA standards. For me, it is ALL about safety and not compliance; luckily, I have many clients who take the same approach, and we have made some serious improvements to a hazardous process. Here is a
Employers are required by 29 CFR* § 1910.147(c)(6) to conduct a periodic inspection of written hazardous energy control (lockout/tagout) procedures. The inspection must be performed at least once annually [per 12-month interval, as stated in 1910.147(c)(6)(i)] because of the significant risks associated with inadequate energy control procedures or the failure to properly implement them [OSHA
One of the most heated debates in the process safety arena is… Do I have to have an emergency response team? EPA has worked to answer this question by designating facilities as “responding” and “Non-responding” facilities. Here is a nice flow chart to help…
Respondent is the owner and operator of the facility that produces, processes, stores, or handles more than 10,000 pounds of ethylene and more than 15,000 pounds of vinyl acetate monomer (Acetic acid ethenyl ester). The EPA inspected the Facility from January 16, 2020 to January 17, 2020, to determine the Respondent’s compliance with 40 C.F
In the past 4-5 months, I have received numerous phone calls and e-mails from friends/clients regarding their desire to hold an OSHA 10-hour course for their employees. Most of this is driven by the idea that they believed, as they were told by some less than scrupulous consultants, that OSHA would accept their 10-hr card
This ammonia refrigeration process is equipped with an oil transfer pump that transfers fresh refrigeration oil from a barrel to fill up the compressor oil separators to the operating oil level. However, the oil pump has been idle for a prolonged period, with the electrical power connection incomplete. Conversely, the associated piping system seems completed.
One way to reduce the risk of an ammonia leak is by monitoring for leakage through the analysis of the secondary coolant (often brine) for signs of ammonia. The secondary coolant in an indirect Ammonia system must be tested no less than twice a year. Information Paper IP-BPV-2021-08-01 outlines the requirements for a secondary coolant analysis that
One of the most dangerous tasks that occur within the battery limits of a covered process is “opening the process.” This is commonly called a “Line Break” but also applies to vessels. We won’t find a definition of “Line Breaking” in the PSM Standard; instead, we turn to OSHA’s Permit-Required Confined Space Standards (1910.146 and
One of the biggest hurdles for an organization entering OSHA’s and EPA’s process safety standards is that some old OSHA standards are just NOT adequate based on the new level of risks. This is most noticeable are with flammable liquid processes. Take, for example, 1910.106, OSHA’s Flammable liquids standard. It is “OK” for businesses that
