Bryan Haywood

Investigating events triggered by Human Error

A traditional view of events and accidents is that they are caused by human competence, attention, or attitude shortcomings. It may be under the label of “loss of situation awareness,” “procedural violation,” or “poor management”. A new and different view is that human error is NOT the cause of failure but a SYMPTOM OF FAILURE

Temporary Equipment as a Potential Source of Ignition on Offshore Facilities (BSEE Safety Alert 449)

Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement field personnel have indicated a need for increased operator awareness when using temporary equipment (TE). Some TE may be a potential ignition source and can range from small items such as portable welding sets to large skid-mounted packages (e.g., temporary generators, air compressors, hydraulic power packs, well-testing equipment, process

EPA’s RMP Emergency Response requirements explained for “Non-Responding Facilities”

In my discussions with SAFTENG members who are Process Safety clients, the question is always asked:  “Where do you get the terms “responding facilities” and “Non-Responding facilities” from?  These are terms used in EPA’s Risk Management Plan rule, and I have said many times in my writings that not every facility is required to have

EPA issues RMP citations @ synthetic rubber manufacturing facility (1, 3-Butadiene and NH3 & $100K)

Respondent has a synthetic rubber manufacturing process at the facility that processes two petrochemicals, butadiene and styrene, and the temperature of the reaction is controlled by anhydrous ammonia. Respondent has greater than a threshold quantity of 1, 3-Butadiene and Ammonia (anhydrous) in a process at the Facility, meeting the “covered process” definition defined by 40

EPA issues RMP GDC citations @ three (3) chemical manufacturing and distribution facilities (Oxidizers and Flammable Liquids & $85K)

Respondent is the current operator of a chemical manufacturing and distribution facilities. The General Duty Clause applies to any stationary source producing, processing, handling, or storing regulated substances, as defined above, or other extremely hazardous substances (“EHS”). EHSs include regulated substances listed pursuant to Section 112(r)(3) of the Act at 40 C.F.R. § 68.130 and

EPA’s proposing changes requiring updating RAGAGEPs

EPA initially looks to the latest version of industry codes, standards, and guidelines to determine whether an owner or operator has documented compliance with RAGAGEP under 40 CFR 68.65(d)(2), given that 40 CFR part 68 does not define the phrase “recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices.” EPA believes this application makes sense because the

EPA considering changing their postion on “Storage Incident to Transportation” in regards to RMP Thresholds

Currently, under 40 CFR 68.3, the term “stationary source” does NOT apply to transportation activities, including storage incident to transportation for any regulated substance or any other extremely hazardous substance.  A stationary source does include transportation containers connected to loading/unloading equipment or used for storage, not incident to transportation. Still, the term “storage, not incident

OSHA announces changes to the Severe Violator Enforcement Program (SVEP) to strengthen enforcement, improve compliance

The new criteria include violations of all hazards and OSHA standards and will continue to focus on repeat offenders in all industries. Previously, an employer could be in the program for failing to meet a limited number of standards. The changes will broaden the program’s scope with the possibility that additional industries will fall within

Scroll to Top