Bryan Haywood

Development of a Confined Space Risk Analysis and Work Categorization Tool (IRSST – Canadian)

The IRSST (Canada) just published a new research report to contribute to confined space accident prevention by helping companies apply existing regulations. Researchers wanted to gain a better understanding of confined space risk management and identify issues based on the literature and field observations, and develop a confined space risk analysis and work categorization tool […]

Severe Injury Reports from 1/1/2015 through 9/30/2016 (OSHA)

Here is an EXCEL spreadsheet with the “Severe Injuries” reported to OSHA from 1/1/2015 through 9/30/2016.  These reports make great content for safety discussions and awareness efforts.  You can sort by Hospitalized, Amputation, Injury Nature, Part of Body, Source, Secondary Source.  You can also download the full data sheet from OSHA.  CLICK HERE (.xls) to download my revised spreadsheet.

Am I required to have a Fire Prevention Plan (FPP)? (1910.39)

Much like the Emergency Action Plan (EAP) requirements, a WRITTEN FPP is ONLY required when your business/facility falls under some other OSHA standard.  And in the case of FPPs, there are ONLY three (3) OSHA standards requiring a FPP: Ethylene Oxide, 1910.1047 Methylenedianiline – 1910.1050 1,3-Butadiene – 1910.1051 Here is a nice flowchart from OSHA

OSHA’s take on Atmospheric Hazards inside Permit-Required Confined Spaces

Back when OSHA was writing their Permit-Required Confined Space standard (1910.146) their review of accident data indicated that most confined space deaths and injuries were caused by atmospheric hazards.  And yet, still today, we see entrant, attendants, and entry supervisors; and even safety personnel, not understanding the atmospheric hazards associated with PRCSs.  I hope to

Why does OSHA consider a “blank flange” and “bolted slip blind” as a Lockout device?

In OSHA’s LOTO standard (1910.147), the agency included in their definition of a “lockout device” a “blank flange” and “bolted slip blind” when in fact, these devices are actually “energy isolation devices.”  So why would OSHA consider these devices a “lockout device”? NOTE:  I am not in agreement with this and have never called a “blank

Scroll to Top