Bryan Haywood

58 incidents & 5 updates (11/30/14)

  2nd Quarter UPDATE with 289 Shocker and Accident Photos Now over 13,750 exclusive unsafe acts/conditions and accident/injuries photos and over 1,000 ppt’s & doc’s from more than 2,776 contributors!   Many THANKS to my RENEWING “Partners in Safety“ since 2009 since 2014 since 2009 since 2009 2014 Fatality Tracker Electrical 50 (2013 = 32) (2012 =

EPA RMP Citations @ a latex resin manufacturing plant (vinyl acetate monomer; $47K)

Respondent does business in the State of Alabama. Respondent operates a “stationary source” that has one RMProgram covered process, latex resin manufacturing, which stores or otherwise uses vinyl acetate monomer in an amount exceeding its applicable threshold of 15,000 pounds. Respondent has submitted and registered an RMPlan to the EPA for the stationary source identified

What is a service class in Chlorine piping?

In the world of process safety, we live by our chosen and adopted Recognized and Generally Accepted Good Engineering Practice(s) (RAGAGEP) and when our HHC/EHS is Chlorine (Cl2) we turn to the Chlorine Institute and their “Pamphlets” for our needs.  And one of their most-used pamphlets is Pamphlet 6 – Piping Systems for Dry Chlorine. 

OSHRC decision on Combustible Dusts (OSHA Dust Sampling, Chain of Custody, Knowledge of hazards, and Signage for ComDust areas)

Facility manufactures over 600 small animal products, including bird food, but not dog and cat food, which are sold in small and large chain pet stores. Fifty to 60 employees work in its 120,000 square foot production facility and warehouse. Part of the facility, measuring 8,000 to 10,000 square feet, is devoted to assembling small

OSHRC decisions on Machine Specific LOTO Procedures, LOTO Periodic Inspections, and LOTO Training for Affected/Other employees

These LOTO decisions by the OSHRC are HUGE in establishing some “minimums” for LOTO procedures, periodic inspections, and training for “affected” and “other” employees.  Readers should pay very close attention to the details that OSHA used in their arguments of how poorly “machine-specific procedures” were written (missing data, conflicting data, no magnitudes listed, etc.).  The

EPA RMP Citations @ Cold Storage Facility (NH3; $124K)

Respondent owns and operates a controlled-temperature storage warehouse for food products. The Facility is located adjacent to Interstate 91 and east of the Quinnipiac River, within a mile of numerous shops and business and approximately 1 mile from several schools. Respondent uses anhydrous ammonia in a refrigeration “process”.  In 2009, Respondent filed a Program 3

Scroll to Top