Bryan Haywood

LOTO Training Requirements

OSHA’s performance-oriented LOTO training program requirements, as detailed in §1910.147(c)(7), were developed to provide employer flexibility and deal with various workplace conditions. The specific training material will vary from workplace to workplace and even from employee to employee within a single workplace, depending upon: the complexity of the machine or equipment and the procedures, the […]

Shift or Personnel Changes

The employer must ensure that specific procedures are implemented during shift or personnel changes to provide a continuity of lockout or tagout protection throughout this transition period. This assurance usually involves action by the authorized or supervisory employee (Primary Authorized Employee) responsible for coordinating affected workforces and maintaining LOTO protection. See §§ 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C) and 1910.147(f)(4).

Verification of ZERO ENERGY STATE (ZES)

Verification by the authorized employee that the previous steps of the procedure have effectively isolated the machine or equipment must be done prior to starting the servicing or maintenance work.  The authorized employees need to verify that: the machine or equipment has been turned off or shut down properly; all the energy-isolating devices were identified,

Tagout and Full Employee Protection (e.g. Tag Plus)

LOCKOUT is a more effective means of ensuring the de-energization of equipment; it is the preferred method because lockout-based safety programs are less susceptible to human error, and tagout devices have INHERENT PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS. Therefore, if the energy isolating device is capable of being locked out, the standard requires LOCKOUT unless the employer can demonstrate

LOTO on Chemical Process and Piping Systems

The Control of Hazardous Energy (lockout/tagout) standard regulates the servicing and/or maintenance of chemical process systems and associated piping, even though the energy sources (e.g., chemical and thermal energy) and control methods used in process hazards management are somewhat different from those encountered with machinery and mechanical equipment. Typically, the procedural steps required for the

29 incidents & 0 updates (4/21/11)

Many THANKS to my NEW & RENEWING Corporate Partners in Safety! since 2005 since 3/2011 since 2007 since 3/2011 2011 Fatality Tracker Electrical 11 (2010 = 90) (2009 = 100) Forklift/Manlift Mobile Equipment  31 (2010 = 110) (2009=88) Mining 65 (2010 = 480) (2009 = 586) Explosions 73 (2010 = 246) (2009 = 302) Cranes

Unguarded Shaft Incident

IncidentWorker was in the process of checking gauges when suddenly he felt a pulling motion on his right hip and back side. His coveralls had become entangled in an unguarded shaft and were being sheared off. Unable to escape or break free of the drawing motion the worker was able to reach the motor clutch

Scroll to Top