Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)

Review of accidents involving ammonia (Institute For Systems Engineering And Informatics)

This is a study done by Commission of the European Communities which looked at the causes and consequences of Ammonia Accidents in the-the EU.  It is a nice breakdown of the accidents and their contributing factors that we may be able to learn from. Due to its massive use, ammonia is often involved in accidents. Ammonia is…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Review of accidents involving ammonia (Institute For Systems Engineering And Informatics) Read More »

Analysis of Liquid Ammonia Leakage Accidents based on Safety System Engineering Theory

Liquid ammonia leakage accidents can cause serious consequences. This paper makes research on the liquid ammonia leakage accidents based on safety system engineering theory model. Shanghai Baoshan”8.31” liquid ammonia leakage accident is used as an example in this paper and the direct and indirect reasons for the accident are analyzed and combined into four factors: human, material…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Analysis of Liquid Ammonia Leakage Accidents based on Safety System Engineering Theory Read More »

Explosion of a sulphuric acid tank (H2 Explosion – 2009 France)

This explosion is VERY SIMILAR to the fatal hotwork explosion that occurred in 2001 at Motiva Enterprises.  The Motiva explosion occurred when a work crew had been repairing a catwalk above a sulfuric acid storage tank farm when a spark from their hot work ignited flammable vapors in one of the tanks. This tank had holes in…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Explosion of a sulphuric acid tank (H2 Explosion – 2009 France) Read More »

Analysis of Accidents in Chemical Process Industry and Lessons Learnt

A study of past accidents in the chemical process industry (CPI) has been carried out by Helsinki University of Technology, Plant Design, Department of Biotechnology and Chemical Technology. It is found that the majority (73%) of the accidents were caused by technical and engineering failures. Based on the causes of accident and types of equipment failures,…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Analysis of Accidents in Chemical Process Industry and Lessons Learnt Read More »

Start-Up Accident – Metal scaffold deck ejected out of cooling tower (PSSR FAILURE)

After maintenance, a scaffold was taken away to be able to start the cooling fan.  Seconds after start up of a cooling fan, there was a lot of noise and a metal scaffold deck flew through the air and fell on the ground.  CLICK HERE (pdf) for the Incident Alert…. Membership Required You must be a...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Start-Up Accident – Metal scaffold deck ejected out of cooling tower (PSSR FAILURE) Read More »

Is your HHC/EHS a “Category M Fluid” (ASME B31.3)?

Back in 2012, I wrote an article about ASME’s “Lethal Service” definition in the hopes of providing some direction in how we could establish which of our HHC/EHSs may rise to the level of “lethal service” as it applies to the design of our pressure vessels. The article stirred much debate among the SAFTENG die-hards,…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Is your HHC/EHS a “Category M Fluid” (ASME B31.3)? Read More »

Chlorine Piping design specs and joinment

A few months ago we discussed the first step in establishing our Dry Chlorine piping “service class” and in that article, I stressed how critically important that step was, as the rest of our design will be based on the chosen “service class”.  In this article, we will see that I was not joking!  As…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Chlorine Piping design specs and joinment Read More »

What is NURF in the PSM World?

No it is not a spongy football for kids! NURF is the acronym for “Normally Unoccupied and Remote Facility”. It is a term used in OSHA’s PSM standard and NURFs are EXEMPTED from complying with OSHA’s PSM standard; however, EPA’s RMP rule does NOT have a NURF exemption so be careful – EPA manages this…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

What is NURF in the PSM World? Read More »

Pressure Vessel Failure Study

The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors recorded the number of accidents involving pressure vessels at an increase of 24% over the course of a year between 1999 to 2000. These statistics include power boilers, steam heating boilers, water heating boilers, and unfired pressure vessels. However, the increased number of accidents was not reflected…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Pressure Vessel Failure Study Read More »

OSHA PSM citations @ refinery (Document Control & $77K)

PLEASE NOTE that this citation is SIGNIFICANT in that OSHA took issue with how Operating Procedures were controlled/revised/managed!  OSHA found operators using three (3) different revisions for the same task that caused the release.  Document control records had odd dates as well.  A “document control” system is NOT a PSM (or RMP) requirement, BUT we…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA PSM citations @ refinery (Document Control & $77K) Read More »

Is changing the “service” of your pressure vessel a change that requires an MOC?

This is another example of a change to our process that may not require a wrench to complete, but it is my opinion, as well as now the National Board’s, that changing the service of a pressure vessel is indeed a change that should undergo an MOC.  The National Board Inspection Code (NBIC) Part 2, SUPPLEMENT…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Is changing the “service” of your pressure vessel a change that requires an MOC? Read More »