Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)

When you need to PNEUMATICALLY pressure test your pressure vessel

There may come a time that we need to pressure test one of our pressure vessels after a repair or alteration and our FIRST CHOICE of methods to use should be Hydrostatic as it is MUCH SAFER than pneumatic. However, in some cases, we may NOT be able to perform a hydrostatic test for a…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Does your process have a rupture disc below the relief valve?

Some processes have a relief system that includes a rupture disk below the relief valve.  This is done for several reasons, but the two most common reasons are: The process is corrosive and can cause issues with the Relief Valve leading to failures and a shortened life span The process contains a Category M fluid and any leakage, ever…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Have you revised your Incident Investigation procedure/practices and report form(s) for your RMP covered process(s)?

One of the recent amendments of EPA’s RMP rule impacted our Incident Investigation procedures/practices and most likely any report forms we had been using for years and years. The RMP and PSM Incident Investigation elements used to be very similar and thus most of us used the same procedure/practices and forms when trying to comply…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

NJ’s Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act (TCPA) Program Update

The state of NJ has developed a Toxic Catastrophe Prevention Act (TCPA) Program Update intended to assist regulated TCPA facilities in understanding how they are impacted by the January 13, 2017, amendments to EPA’s RMP Rule, 40 CFR Part 68. The table indicated the effective dates of the amendments, which provisions are incorporated by the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

NFPA 51B – 2019 Updates to Fire Watch and Fire Monitoring Requirements

Many of us in the PSM/RMP arena use NFPA 51B as our Hot Work Safety Standard, rather than 1910.252(a) and with that said I thought I should update us on NFPA’s 2019 edition of 51B which includes several key improvements.  Probably the biggest changes from the 2014 edition are: the term FIRE WATCH is now officially…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Emergency Pressure Control Systems (EPCS) and Car Seal Program

One phrase that drives me crazy while working with my friends in the Ammonia Refrigeration industry is, “Come on, Bryan; we’re not a refinery or chemical plant; that is unnecessary here.”  For example, recently, we were asked to aid in an investigation into a reportable release from a PSM/RMP-covered process, and during our review of…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA’s RMP and Ammonia Refrigeration

UPDATED on 2/6/19, based on feedback from my friend and Refrigeration PSM Extrodinare Brian Chapin over at RCE (A former Partner in Safety).  I have shared his analysis and my rebuttal/agreement… By a long shot, these are the top three (3) issues found with Ammonia Refrigeration RMPs: The NH3 is “Liquified by Pressure” – not…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

LOPC… just four letters but they mean SO MUCH to process safety engineers

One of my favorite parts of teaching the 1-day PSM Intro course at ASSE SeminarFest is the vast numbers of students and all of their learnings and experiences being shared. This year was even better than years before – in fact, we had so many side-bar discussions because of the great input from the students…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

An emergency alarm system at a PSM/RMP facility and NFPA 72

Those in the PSM/RMP world know that the facility is REQUIRED to have an Emergency Action Plan (1910.38) and by virtue of having to comply with 1910.38, we also have to comply with 1910.165 Employee Alarm System. The language in 1910.165 is really vague and causes much confusion when it comes to the emergency alarm…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Why are the pressure vessels in my PSM/RMP covered processes managed differently than those “every day” type pressure vessels?

Recently I had a client who made alterations to a pressure vessel (PV) in an ammonia refrigeration process that required the PV to be re-certified. The state where this PV resides is a “coded state”, meaning they have adopted ASME Code for the PVs within the state. So, the contractor making the alterations had scheduled…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Is API 570 your Piping Inspection/Repair RAGAGEP… Repair Requirements are now crystal clear

If API 570 is your facility’s piping inspection/repair RAGAGEP, the battle over “repair requirements” just got easier!  A very popular question in PSM/RMP circles has become… “Do we have to make repairs in the same manner as we did the initial install of the pipe?” In other words, what is being asked is… “Can we bypass…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top