This table shows the number of RMP facilities — facilities that could potentially have toxic or flammable chemical accidents with off-site consequences. Accident information is summed up from the most recent 5-year accident history for each reported facility. State # of RMP facilities # of accidents # of deaths # of injuries # evacuated Property […]
Yes, EPA has a General Duty Clause for RMP, much like OSHA’s General Duty Clause. However, EPA’s is much more detail. This month I came across a facility that used to be a RMP/PSM covered facility, but after much work they lowered their quantities below the RMP/PSM Thresholds. Once this was done, they literally threw
I have had tons of questions and comments on last week’s article regarding EPA’s General Duty Clause as it relates to RMP Listed chemicals (e.g. Extremely Hazardous Substances) and the requirements for employers, EVEN if they were below the RMP Threshold. As EPA states in one of their Fact Sheets on the GDC…It is important
Top 10 RMP Chemicals by On-Site Quantities This table shows amounts of each chemical within processes that have worst-case accidents that could potentially reach off-site. Facilities that are no longer registered with RMP are not included. Chemical Name Chemical Type # of facilities Pounds in processes Ammonia (anhydrous) Toxic 7,672 182,886,947,607 Flammable Mixture Flammable 669
One Year After Catastrophic Accident at the Tesoro Refinery the CSB Continues its Investigation into the April 2010 AccidentBoard Releases a Video Safety Message; Calls on Industry to Invest in Preventive Maintenance Marking the one year anniversary of the tragic accident at the Tesoro Refinery in Anacortes, Washington, the U.S. Chemical Safety Board (CSB) released
Is there a method to OSHA’s madness in regards to the PSM required operating procedures?
Bryan, Here are some observations related to Bayer PHA effectiveness, as mentioned in the CSB report. The Chem Safety Board Incident Investigation Report for the Bayer incident was very critical regarding the quality / effectiveness of the PHA study. Please take a look over the attached extract from the report and keep these items in
You know, sometimes we need to have our efforts validated. I put myself out there on a daily basis to try my best to educate those who are willing to listen to my ideas and rationale. I take a lot of hits and it gets to me every once in a while. But with over
Although both EPA and OSHA use similar definitions to define who is an “incidental contractor” and those contractors who need to be evaluated to work in, on, or adjacent to a “covered process”, there is still much confusion on the intent of the “contractor element” and which type of contractors should be included and the
Some interesting data on Anhydrous Ammonia releases in NY state from 1993-1998.
I have been asked to explain the difference between actions an operator may take during a process leak and the actions that the same operator may take as an “emergency responder” to the leak.
Still today (2011) we come across facilities working so hard to be the best they can be in PSM/RMP and in 99% of their process they are exceeding expectations. They are doing EVERYTHING WELL and running a VERY TIGHT ship…except for the loading and unloading of their Highly Hazardous Chemical (HHC).
