Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)

Post Weld Heat Treating (PWHT) failure

This was a new pressure vessel that failed during its hydro test following its fabrication.  The vessel’s Post Weld Heat Treatment was not properly conducted, when some parts of it did not reach the required temperature.  Coupled with a small hydrogen crack, the failed post weld heat treatment was sufficient to cause catastrophic failure while […]

Re-Submitting your RMP

RMPs MUST be updated at least once EVERY five (5) years. Owners and operators responsible for RMP implementation should review the factsheet A Checklist for Submitting your Risk Management Plan (pdf). This factsheet provides a checklist to consider in updating and resubmitting RMPs. Use EPA’s RMP*eSubmit for your resubmissions. For additional information see the RMP*eSubmit Users’

RMP Facilities in the United States as of December 2009

Under the Clean Air Act, Section 112(r), the EPA established a program requiring facilities possessing greater than certain threshold quantities of 140 chemicals to provide risk management plans to the EPA.1  As part of this reporting requirement, facilities are required to determine the worst-case scenario release from a single chemical process, using EPA criteria and guidelines.2 Facilities

Verifying my “ground” has less than 10 ohms resistance

Verifying that grounding and bonding systems meet a specific resistance threshold—such as the common 10 ohms target for flammable liquid processes—requires a systematic approach to ensure both accuracy and technician safety. The following procedure outlines the steps for performing a static ground-resistance test using a dedicated ground-resistance tester (Ohmmeter). This procedure applies to the periodic

Management of Organizational Change (OSHA Letter to RAs)

March 31, 2009 MEMORANDUM FOR:     REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS THROUGH:        DONALD G. SHALHOUB DEPUTY ASSISTANT SECRETARY   FROM:                RICHARD E. FAIRFAX, DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT PROGRAMS  SUBJECT:          Management of Organizational Change This memorandum addresses the application of 29 CFR 1910.119 (l), Process Safety Management (PSM) – Management of Change (MOC), to

EPA Can Improve Implementation of the Risk Management Program for Airborne Chemical Releases (EPA OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL)

EPA can improve its program management and oversight to better assure that facilities covered by the Clean Air Act’s Risk Management Program submit or re-submit an RMP. EPA had not established national procedures for identifying covered facilities that had not submitted RMPs. For the 5 States reviewed, we identified 48 facilities in 3 States that

Not enough water is a bad thing and too much water is a bad thing in Anhydrous Ammonia Processes

This article is for ANYONE with anhydrous ammonia, regardless if you have 100 pounds or 100,000 pounds of ammonia and your primary means of containment is Carbon Steel. I have written numerous times about the Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) failure mode and shared numerous accidents and alerts regarding this failure mode. In this article, I

MAJOR CHEMICAL DISASTERS IN INDIA

MAJOR CHEMICAL DISASTERS IN INDIA   Origin of accident Year Date Location Products involved Number of Deaths Injured Evacuated Explosion (warehouse) 1992 29.04 New Delhi Chemicals 43 20   Fire at a chemical store 1994 13.11 New Delhi Toxiccloud (chemicals)   500   Leakage 1984 03.12 Bhopal* Methyl isocyanate 2800 50,000 200,000 Leakage 1989 05.05

National Board Inspection Code vs. API 510

This article discusses how a facility would need to get one of its coded pressure vessels repaired, altered, or re-rated. The article will cover pertinent code and jurisdiction requirements and the differences among the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code, the National Board Inspection Code (NBC), and American Petroleum Institute (API) requirements, as well

Scroll to Top