OSHA Compliance

Safety masquerading behind Hi-Vis gear

I like the fact the thieves wore “high vis” clothing to make themselves look “legitimate”. But as the story points out they were getting injured in arc flash events. I support Hi Vis workwear, as it can’t hurt to be more visible in a busy workplace, especially with a lot of mobile equipment around. My…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Hazard ID is fundamental to any SMS and an ALJ who gets it

Sometimes a lawyer or set of lawyers can surprise us… This is a quote from a recent OSHRC ALJ decision, regarding the employer’s responsibility to conduct inspections of the workplace to identify and correct hazards: “As an employer, Respondent is obligated to provide safe working conditions and ensure safe work practices. Implicit in that obligation…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

LOTO Safety Myth #1

I have written dozens of articles around these “safety myths”, but Jonathan Zimmerman and I were not selected to present this at ASSP several years ago so I thought I would share it as a series here. These are topics that I still get challenged on in 2024/2025 and often I am unable to convince…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

CO2 Tank launches 100′ off-site into a home (Flood Waters)

A soft drink manufacturer had a 3-ton capacity carbon dioxide (CO2) receiver tank at the plant. The tank contained 2000 pounds on the day of the explosion. The establishment was evacuated due to flooding river waters in the area. The plant was secured and evacuated. No employees were at the workplace. Suddenly, the storage tank…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Not recognizing “change of service” for Pressure Vessel(s) leads to catastrophic failure (Brittle Fracture Failure)

On September 19, 2002, Employee #1 was painting one (1) of six (6) tanks containing carbon dioxide when three (3) of them suddenly exploded. He was killed. The tanks were originally built as railroad tank cars for liquefied petroleum gas and they were not designed to store carbon dioxide…. Membership Required You must be a...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA settles “Worker overcome by carbon dioxide fumes at LAX dies”

At 7:00 a.m. on October 31, 2022, an employee, 36, was brazing a copper line in an electrical equipment room that was equipped with a carbon dioxide fire extinguishing system. The fire extinguishing system activated, discharging and flooding the room with carbon dioxide. The employee was unable to escape the room and was overcome and…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHRC establishes who is an “employee” vs. “independent contractor”

In response to a report of a fatality at Respondent’s place of business, Complainant initiated an inspection that concluded with Complainant issuing a four-item Citation and Notification of Penalty. For the most part, the specifics of the alleged violations—which include: are not particularly complicated. The wrinkle in this case is whether the workers identified by…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Safety Thought of the Week… Reason’s “Swiss cheese” model of accident causation

In memory of James Reason, I thought it would be fitting to share, in my professional opinion, one of the greatest safety models of my career. If businesses could just embrace this model when it comes to how they investigate events, we could move workplace safety forward a couple of decades. The model is quite…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Methane gas from well water caused the 2001 CA fatal water tank explosion

Back in June of 2021, a 1.5 million gallon water tank exploded just as a contractor began to perform hot work on it. Now most people would think a water tank would not have explosive properties; thus, the workers, nor the deceased contractor with 16 years experience, did not sample the atmosphere within the tank…....

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA’s Data on 1910.134 – October 2023 through September 2024

Establishment Size: All sizesStandard: 1910.134 Respiratory Protection. Citations issued during the period October 2023 through September 2024. Penalties shown reflect current rather than initial amounts…. Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a member? Log in here...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

NIOSH Science Policy Update – Fit-Testing HPDs

The following describes the NIOSH policy for determining the attenuation provided by hearing protection devices for individual workers. This statement updates the 1998 NIOSH Criteria for a Recommended Standard—Occupational Noise Exposure. RecommendationNIOSH recommends employers use individual, quantitative fit testing to evaluate the attenuation received by workers from their hearing protection devices. Quantitative fit testing is…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories (1910.1450)

The Standard entitled “Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories” (29 CFR 1910.1450; the “Standard”) applies to laboratories that use hazardous chemicals in accord with the Standard’s definitions for “laboratory use of hazardous chemicals” and “laboratory scale.” The Standard requires these laboratories to maintain worker exposures at or below the permissible exposure limits specified for…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top