Safety Info Posts

The Bhopal Chemical and is it as bad as you think

It has been 36 years since the Bhopal tragedy killed thousands of people late one night when it was released from its process.  I was recently surprised by a facility claiming that the incident was “overblown” and that “MIC is a vital chemical to commerce around the world”.  I can’t disagree with the second statement,…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Just how toxic is a “highly toxic” hazardous material?

Both OSHA and the International Fire Code use the Lethal-Dose 50 (LD50) to establish the toxicity of hazardous chemicals/materials and both use the metric milligram per kilogram of body weight in their assessments.  Just so we all have an idea of how small a milligram is… One (1) grain of sand weighs 1 mg An…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Understanding the Inhalation of Gases Hazard Categories

We have been using OSHA’s Hazard Categories from the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) since 2012.  I have written a lot about the flammable categories,  but I tend to get a lot of questions about the Health Hazard Categories in my HAZCOM and HAZMAT training so I thought I would…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Just when you thought it was safe… Chlorine can kick your a_ _!

Two of my major chemical incidents in my career occurred during “demo work” in a process that we were certain was gas-free/zero energy state.  And of course, we were wrong!  Highly toxic/flammable gases can travel long ways to places we never thought possible and do some serious damage to people and property when they get…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Sampling the PSM/RMP covered process can be a serious risk

Just because we intend to handle minimal quantities of the HHC/EHS, the task of “catching a sample” from a covered process can, in fact be one of the more hazardous tasks our operators perform.  Remember, Risk = Frequency X Severity, so operators catch many samples over their shift means this task is a high-frequency task. …...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP citations @ food facility (NH3 & $103K)

Respondent is a Gourmet Pasta Company that uses anhydrous ammonia in two refrigeration “processes,” as defined by 40 C.F.R. § 68.3, in two separate systems of pipes and vessels at the Facility (the “Processes”). On October 12, 2016, Respondent conducted a Process Hazard Analysis (“PHA”) for the Facility. On March 30, 2017, Respondent filed an…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Bonding and Grounding flammable gas systems, why NFPA and OSHA don’t require it

I am going to bet that if you’re reading this article that your facility has a flammable gas that gets transferred from one container to another.  And I will also bet that these transfers are done under the safety blanket of “bonding and grounding” as we do for our flammable liquids.  But did you know,…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP citations @ chemical manufacturer (Cl2 & $62K)

Respondent is the owner and/or operator of a facility that uses chlorine in its chemical manufacturing process. EPA conducted an inspection of the Facility on November 29, 2017, to assess compliance with Section 112(r)(7) of the CAA (the “Inspection”) and the regulations at 40 C.F.R. Part 68. Respondent filed an RMP for the Facility with…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Do the quantities of two separate vessels that are interconnected with a closed valve need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis?

Pursuant to the risk management program regulations, facilities must perform an offsite consequence analysis for the worst-case release scenario. Do the quantities of two separate vessels that are interconnected with a closed valve need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis? … Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Are mechanical controls such as alarms considered administrative controls and therefore limit the worst-case release quantity?

For the purpose of analyzing the worst-case release scenario required as part of the hazard assessment at 40 CFR Part 68, Subpart B, the worst-case release quantity is identified as the greatest amount held in a single vessel or pipe, taking into account administrative controls that limit the maximum quantity (40 CFR §68.25(b)). Are mechanical…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Worst-case release scenario “quantity released” reporting for a mixture

In section 2, element 2.5, of an RMP, facilities must report the quantity of toxic chemical that the facility used for the worst-case analysis. When reporting this data element in RMP*eSubmit for a mixture, should facilities report the entire weight of the toxic mixture potentially being released or only the amount of the regulated toxic…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

What it means to have EXCLUSIVE CONTROL and case in point what happens when we share a lockout/tagout

If we had a dime for each time we get pushback on the most fundamental aspect of Lockout/Tagout (LOTO), we could all retire!  NEVER is an authorized employee allowed to work under someone else lock – PERIOD!  When servicing and maintenance that requires LOTO is performed, then EACH authorized worker MUST HAVE EXCLUSIVE CONTROL of…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top