CLICK HERE to Renew your Membership
CLICK HERE for a NEW Membership
CLICK HERE to see eligibility requirements for FREE Membership
If you have any questions, please contact me

We offer:

I am proud to announce that have extended our”Partners in Safety” agreement for another year (2025).

CI Members, send me an e-mail to request your FREE SAFTENG membership.

Since 2015
Since 2020
Since 2025
Since 2025
Since 2024
Since 2023
Since 2024
Since 2025
Since 2024
Since 2025
Since 2025
Since 2023
Since 2024
Since 2025
Missed Preventive Maintenance Inspections/Tests
No hunman and no organization is perfect!  Although we should strive for perfection in all aspects of business (Production, Quality, Cost Control, and EHS), we often mis-step or possible loose our way altogether.  But how bad do things have to get before it is a REAL PROBLEM? … HomeRead More »
Read More
31 incidents & 1 update (3/20/11)
Many THANKS to my NEW {amp}amp; RENEWING Corporate Partners in Safety! since 2007 since 2011 since 2009 since 2/11 2011 Fatality Tracker Electrical 5 (2010 = 90) (2009 = 100) Forklift/Manlift Mobile Equipment{amp}nbsp; 27 (2010 = 110) (2009=88) Mining 43 (2010 = 480)...
Read More
Emergency Shutdown (when does it get activated)
I continue to see facilities struggle with the emergency shutdown SOP requirements and how it is all suppose to flow and fit into the daily operations.  In this post I will try and lay out a flow to help make sense of these PSM/RMP requirements.  I am hopeful you can learn from my mistakes, as I have learned this the hard way from many OSHA inspections and accident investigations. …...
Read More
goodyear heat_exchanger_explosion
Car Seal Program and Relief Valves
We do not see these types of failures often, but when we do it can almost always be traced back to human error.  Back in 2008, a tube and shell heat exchanger catastrophically failed when workers accidentally closed two different valves at two different times between the vessel and its relief valve. On June 10, 2008, operators closed an isolation valve between the heat exchanger shell (ammonia...
Read More
How to use your PHA to write your SOPs
Does the title make you scratch your head? I usually get some strange looks when working with a client who is trying to understand what the PSM compliance cycle looks like. To start with, let’s look at what OSHA/EPA requires in our operating procedures: 1910.119(f)(1)(ii) Operating limits 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(A) Consequences of deviation 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(B) Steps required to correct or avoid...
Read More
Table H-23
Starting point for PSM Facility Siting when dealing with Flammables (updated with LPG on 8/12/12)
If your PSM/RMP covered process contains a flammable liquid, 1910.106 has provided us with some regulatory facility siting requirements that we can quickly inspect to ensure we meet the minimum compliance distances. If you have liquefied petroleum gases within your facility, 1910.110 provides some basic siting requirements that should be met to have an argument that the propane will not impact your...
Read More
Is your Diking in your PSI and MI
Many chemical processes that are covered under OSHA’s PSM and EPA RMP rules utilize one of the most popular forms of passive mitigation ever known…Diking.  However, on the other hand, many of the facilities have not included their dikes in their Process Safety Information (PSI) or their Mechanical Integrity Programs (MIP). … HomeRead More »
Read More
Tips when performing PHA's and how Chemical Process Safety should be viewed
I had an interesting dissertation given to me on how to calculate “frequency” when analyzing a PHA scenario during a recent PHA. Although it sounded logical, it was completely off base and thus would have shown the facility at very low risk for all their scenarios. This is something we see from time to time so I thought I would provide my two cents on the matter. 1) PHA participants should...
Read More
Buying a used PSM/RMP facility or used equipment for PSM/RMP
Since the great recession of 2008 -2010 we have seen an increase in the used equipment market.  This is due to so many businesses going under and auctioning off their equipment and the remaining businesses needing to find ways to save $. … HomeRead More »
Read More
Evaluating Confined Spaces (1910.146(c))
So, who has to do Confined Space Evaluations, and when must this evaluation be done? The short answers are ALL General Industry (1910) employers and at the time the standard was promulgated and before each entry. Let me explain… … HomeRead More »
Read More
Making sense of entry options under OSHA's PRCS Entry Std. 1910.146
One of the most asked-about standards is OSHA’s Permit-Required Confined Space (PRCS) standard. The standard can be difficult to decipher, so this post attempts to break down an employer’s entry options. We should view the standard as offering three (3) entry options. Each option has its own set of rules and pros and cons. Once a facility has completed its Confined Space/Permit Required...
Read More
Conductivity of common solvents
Making sense of non-conductive flammable liquids
Like many safety professionals, I learned there is a HUGE difference in flammable liquids the HARD WAY.  Having a strong background in fire/HAZMAT, even as an IFSTA instructor 20 years ago; I thought flammable liquids were all about flash points and LEL.  To an emergency responder, that may work, but as a safety engineer responsible for a PSM/RMP-covered process containing non-conductive...
Read More
1 639 640 641 642 643 675

Partner Organizations

Member Associations

Scroll to Top