Bryan Haywood

Six words in 1910.146 that are almost never complied with and may be the greatest challenge for most facilities

Which six words am I talking about?  There are a lot of requirements in 1910.146 and 1926.1201-.1213 that get missed on entries.  Luckily, missing a few here and there USUALLY does not equate to a tragic accident.  However, the six words I speak of are a CRITICAL PATH in a “permitted entry” into a PRCS. …...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

I am reminded that safety is not “common sense”

I am sure we have all heard this reference about safety and common sense.  Unfortunately there are a lot of businesses with senior management that believe this.  I find even those businesses that struggle with minimum compliance requirements will typically have this mindset about safety.  But those businesses who are going beyond the traditional OSHA…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

1910.1020 document retention screams for a formal SMS to meet OSHA minimum expectations

Not many folks spend a lot of time reading 1910.1020 Access to employee exposure and medical records and it shows during most of our OSH audits.  The standard is not a safety standard, so most safety pros don’t spend much time on the standard.  But there is a lot of “document control and retention” needs…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

What documentation should the SMS contain?

I am aware of all the on-line chatter about the “bureaucracy” of a written safety and health program.  Although I do not subscribe to this way of thinking and I know of maybe two facilities that are mature enough to manage safety without a lot of the traditional documentation; this SMS documentation is WAY BEYOND…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Corrective Actions help Incident Investigations become PROACTIVE

Our investigation process is purely reactive to undesired consequences, but our corrective action(s) process can turn it into a PROACTIVE activity.  It takes a level of safety maturity to move in this direction. It will come naturally once that maturity level is reached and the workplace strongly desires (and respects) to be a LEARNING culture. …...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Safety Thought of the Week… Safety is not the absence of Accidents

Safety is not the absence of Accidents. Safety is the presence of Defenses and Capacity.   Dr. Todd Conklin… Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a member? Log in here...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

NFPA 704 – size matters!

SAFTENG audits are known to be “detailed” (the nice way to say it).  We believe that when we are working with MINIMUM PERFORMANCE STANDARDS such as OSHA standards and those standards adopted by a facility to support compliance with these minimum standards, all the details matter.  One of the most deficiencies we come across involves…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

The real, and CRITICAL, date of your PSM/RMP Audit(s)

I get about a dozen calls a year from folks asking me about their PSM/RMP due dates.  I try to explain that of course OSHA or EPA can cite the facility if the audit is past due.  For example, the last audit was done the 2nd week of February 2020, it is expected that the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP Citations @ crude fractionation process (Flammable Gases & $85K)

Respondent has a crude fractionation process at the Facility. EPA inspected the Facility on February 14 – 17, 2022, to determine the Respondent’s compliance with Section 112(r) of the CAA and 40 C.F.R. Part 68. Butane, isopentane, ethane, propane, and pentane are “regulated substances” pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 68.3. The threshold quantity for butane,…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP Citations @ manufacturing facility (Flammable Gases & $233K)

Respondent manufactures a range of specialty surfactants for use predominantly in the oil and gas industry. The process of ethoxylation involves reacting ethylene oxide with various common chemicals, such as fatty alcohols and phenols, to produce a variety of products. The plant can also use propylene oxide instead of (or as well as) ethylene oxide…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Materials of Construction and Compatibility MATTER

This is from an EPA Multimedia inspection that looked at a chemical process that was below the TQ, so they used the RMP GDC to inspect.  What they found in the flammable process was that… … several of the facility’s components were made of aluminum. One condenser was installed with malleable iron tubes instead of…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top