Bryan Haywood

Starting point for PSM Facility Siting when dealing with Flammables (updated with LPG on 8/12/12)

If your PSM/RMP covered process contains a flammable liquid, 1910.106 has provided us with some regulatory facility siting requirements that we can quickly inspect to ensure we meet the minimum compliance distances. If you have liquefied petroleum gases within your facility, 1910.110 provides some basic siting requirements that should be met to have an argument […]

Is your Diking in your PSI and MI

Many chemical processes that are covered under OSHA’s PSM and EPA RMP rules utilize one of the most popular forms of passive mitigation ever known…Diking.  However, on the other hand, many of the facilities have not included their dikes in their Process Safety Information (PSI) or their Mechanical Integrity Programs (MIP).

Making sense of non-conductive flammable liquids

Like many safety professionals, I learned there is a HUGE difference in flammable liquids the HARD WAY.  Having a strong background in fire/HAZMAT, even as an IFSTA instructor 20 years ago, I thought flammable liquids were all about flash points and LEL.  To an emergency responder, that may work, but as a safety engineer responsible

Why bonding and grounding may not be enough

Now here is why bonding and grounding falls well short of being all the precautions we need when transferring NON-CONDUCTIVE FLAMMABLE LIQUIDS.  Bonding and grounding takes into account that we are equalizing the energy levels between the containers and therefore the static will not be released to the differently charged container.  This works when it

Report reveals fundamental management flaws lay behind Buncefield disaster

Fundamental safety management failings were the root cause of Britain’s most costly industrial disaster, a new publication reveals. The report into the explosion and five-day fire at the Buncefield Oil Storage Depot in December 2005 tells for the first time the full story of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and Environment Agency’s (EA) investigation.

UPDATE on Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards (CFATS)

Members of a key congressional panel have called for a long-term extension of the U.S. Homeland Security Department effort that sets regulations for facilities that manufacture, use, store or distribute substances that could be used to produce chemical warfare materials. While lawmakers lauded the program, they expressed frustration with aspects of the effort that have

Scroll to Top