First, let me say this article was written for those who do NOT live in the world of process safety, but yet they do have hazardous materials on-site in some type of bulk system, albeit below the PSM/RMP thresholds. In this posting, I am going to use Propane/LPG as my HAZMAT as there are many […]
The Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Air Pollution Control (DAPC) has adopted amended rules in Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) Chapter 3745-104, “Accidental Releases Prevention Program” Rules. The rules in this chapter establish Ohio’s Accidental Release Prevention Program. These rules were promulgated after Ohio received the delegation of authority from USEPA in December 1999 for
Respondent owned and operated a petroleum refinery with the Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) code 2911. The Facility produces, processes, stores, or handles more than the threshold quantities of flammable and toxic substances identified in 40 C.F.R. § 68.130. The regulated flammable substances that are held above the threshold quantities identified in 40 C.F.R. § 68.130
Respondent is the owner and operator of a facility that has five inorganic chemical manufacturing processes, meeting the definition of “process”, as defined by 40 C.F.R. § 68.3. Bromine, ammonia (anhydrous), chlorine, sulfur trioxide, propylene oxide, oleum (fuming sulfuric acid), and sulfur dioxide (anhydrous) are each a “regulated substance” pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 68.3.
An explosion and fire that killed a press operator and hospitalized eight other employees at a paint resins and coatings manufacturer could have been prevented had the employer not altered a kettle reactor vessel improperly and then returned the vessel to service after it failed following the alterations, a federal workplace safety inspection has found.
One of the biggest failures in many “Car Seal” programs is their improper application. I’m not sure where or how this confusion began, but far too many businesses are using car seals well beyond their intended function. Here is a simple way to look at “car seal” programs and how they differ from “servicing/maintenance” programs
Respondent is the operator of a chemical manufacturing and distribution facility that ses anhydrous ammonia to produce several chemicals, including ammonium sulfate (made by reacting ammonia with sulfuric acid) and aqueous ammonia (a solution of anhydrous ammonia and water). Anhydrous ammonia arrives by railcar and is distributed through pipes to chemical processes around the Facility.
From Oxford’s Dictionary… priority the fact or condition of being regarded or treated as more important. value a person’s principles or standards of behavior; one’s judgment of what is important in life. Which do we want safety to be?
An amusement park ride is a far cry from a chemical process, but this horrible incident is one we can all learn from! A 6-year old little girl died on September 5, 2021 while riding a drop tower-style ride that uses gravity to create freefall. The two (2) ride operators, which I am assuming were
A safety aspiration is something like… “I don’t want anyone to get hurt” Safety goals are…
We don’t see these every day and to be honest, the incidents, the violations, and the compliance plan are too much for me to break down. I have broken out the incidents and the citations that EPA issued for each of these incidents, but you will have to go to the CAFO to get the
Respondent owns and operates a facility that processes, stores, and distributes produce. On June 21, 2018, EPA performed an inspection of the Facility pursuant to Section 112(r) of the CAA, Sections 304–12 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, and Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. §
