Bryan Haywood

Did Technical BC just say pressure vessels in NH3 refrigeration need to be PWHT?

This topic has always been one that seemed to be controversial in the ammonia refrigeration sector, with decades of denial that Stress Corrosion Cracking could occur in an ammonia refrigeration process due to the water content in the ammonia.  But last month, Technical BC (British Columbia) discussing their SCC concerns related to pressure vessels in…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA addresses the forever on-going debate about revised RAGAGEPs and the facility’s responsibility to upgrade

One of the biggest and longest debates in process safety circles is the responsibility of businesses to upgrade their process design(s) based on an updated RAGAGEP.  OSHA attempted to address this in a 2016 LOI.  Now EPA has stated their “official position”… (emphasis by me)… Membership Required You must be a member to access this...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA issues RMP citations @ fluoroproducts facility (Oleum and HF & $205K)

The Respondent owns and/or operates a chemical manufacturing facility that uses: A. Oleum (fuming sulfuric acid) [sulfuric acid, mixture with sulfur trioxide] (“Oleum”); B. Hydrogen fluoride/hydrofluoric acid (cone 50% or greater) [hydrofluoric acid] (“Hf “). in a fluoroproducts process and a sulfuric acid process.  From August 28 – 31, 2018, EPA conducted an inspection of…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP GDC citations @ Ammonia plant (NH3 & $39K)

The Facility is a nitrogenous fertilizer manufacturing facility that produces anhydrous ammonia, urea solutions, urea-ammonium nitrate, and by-product gaseous carbon dioxide. The Facility also produces intermediates (including nitric acid and ammonium nitrate solution) during the manufacture of the above products. Based on the quantity of anhydrous ammonia present at the Facility, the Facility is subject…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

What constitutes an emergency response or incidental release of anhydrous ammonia

OSHA updated a 2017 Letter of Interpretation in January 2021 and it is causing quite a stir in the anhydrous ammonia (NH3) fertilizer industry and could have impacts on other industries that use NH3.  In this revised LOI, OSHA states… … Therefore, OSHA believes it is possible, and indeed likely, that any given release of…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

As a profession we should agree to hate “half-truths”

I just finished reviewing a draft document that a trade group will be asked to vote to sanction the document as it relates to emergency escape respirators.  There was a lot of talk about requiring these escape respirators to carry the NIOSH approval of 14G (vs. the more traditional 23C style respirator).  There is talk…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

On your next RMP 5-year Update, be sure to include this

At least every five (5) years a Risk Management Plan must be updated.  We are seeing a lot of RMP that have been updated in the past 12-16 months that failed to include this in their update.  I wrote about this new requirement this past weekend, but now I want to demonstrate the “fall-out” from…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Have we updated our EAP and/or ERP to ensure compliance with 40 CFR Part 1604?

Back in February, I broke down the Chemical Safety Board’s new Chemical Incident Reporting Rule (40 CFR Part 1604) and since then we have conducted quite a few safety reviews, emergency response training sessions, and PSM/RMP audits and so far we have not found a single facility that has updated their Emergency Response and/or Emergency…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Chlorine Dioxide released inside a tomato processing plant – 47 workers sent to hospital

On August 21, 2011, Forty-seven (47) employees, 38 from the primary employer and nine (9) from a secondary temporary agency, were sent to hospitals for treatment of respiratory irritation after being exposed to chlorine dioxide released inside a tomato processing plant. Three (3) employees were admitted for further treatment. The chlorine dioxide release was due…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA issues RMP citations @ biopharmaceutical facility (NH3 & $527K)

Respondent owns and operates a biopharmaceutical facility that stores and uses anhydrous ammonia in parts of the storage and refrigeration process. Respondent’s storage and refrigeration process does not meet the eligibility requirements for Program 1 under 40 C.F.R. ยง 68.10(g) and is subject to the OSHA process safety management standard since the process involves ammonia…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA issues EPCRA citations @ meat processing facility (1,700 lbs NH3 release & $68K)

Respondent is the owner of the meat processing facility which utilizes anhydrous ammonia, a hazardous substance, at the Facility.  From December 28-30, 2017, Respondent inadvertently released approximately 1,700 pounds of ammonia due to a faulty isolation valve in the Facility’s refrigeration system (“the Release”). On December 13, 2018, EPA conducted an inspection of the Facility…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA issues RMP citations @ chemical plant (HF, Cl2, HCL, VDF & $17K)

Respondent is the owner and/or operator of the Facility, which has registered an RMPlan with the EPA for its Facility and has developed an RMProgram accidental release prevention program for the Facility. On February 26, 2019, the EPA issued to Respondent a Notice of Potential Violation (“NOPV”), providing notice that the EPA found that Respondent…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top