This CAFO both initiates and resolves an administrative action for the assessment of monetary penalties, pursuant to Section 113(d) of the CAA. As discussed below, the CAFO resolves the following CAA violations that Complainant alleges occurred in connection with Respondent ‘s storage and handling of anhydrous ammonia at its cold storage and distribution facility: failure […]
The business was convicted of one violation under the Environmental Protection Act and was fined $100,000 plus a victim fine surcharge of $25,000, with eight months to pay the fine. Background: The business operates a facility in the County of Lambton, which produces food grade carbon dioxide and is supplied with raw carbon dioxide from a
While doing some “Pre-Start Up Review” work for a client, I was tasked with reviewing the Emergency Response aspect of the facility’s ability to respond to an NH3 incident. As part of this review I asked the question… Have we coordinated our emergency response needs with the LEPC and the local FD(s)? This is a NEW
This is a reminder that despite decades of work by to improve confined space entry by maritime safety organizations, training institutions, and vessel owners/operators, the risks have NOT BEEN ELIMINATED. This is illustrated by a recent casualty where three (3) persons were asphyxiated while working onboard a laid-up Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit (MODU). Although the investigation is not
This morning, we had some serious weather pass through the Cincinnati area, and many areas lost power. Ironically, I was conversing with a client in MI about emergency lighting inspections when the power at the facility where I am this week went out. Of course, this facility’s emergency lighting activated and worked properly, so employees
THIS CASE IS NOT A FINAL ORDER OF THE REVIEW COMMISSION AS IT IS PENDING COMMISSION REVIEW This case arose from an anhydrous ammonia (NH3) release that occurred on May 23, 2017, at a Power Plant. OSHA conducted an investigation and subsequently issued a two-item citation for alleged violations with proposed penalties of $18,108. In
As I have said many times before, the world of process safety can be a very confusing and strange sandbox to play in. There are so many rumors and innuendoes stemming from the fact that our PSM/RMP world is made up of a weave of RAGAGEPs, many of which practicing process safety professional can’t fully understand
9/2020 UPDATE: I have contacted the Minnesota Department of Agriculture, Pesticide & Fertilizer Management Division regarding a statement on this 2-page “Cheat Sheet” regarding their apparent requirement that Hydrosrtatic RVs be put on NH3 vapor piping and vapor hoses. This is how it is presented: Hydrostats must be installed in each section of liquid and
Background: Your company has an internal communication method to communicate the identity of hazardous chemicals transported on company vehicles from one location to another location within the same building (intra-plant). This method uses words, pictures, and/or product identification number, NFPA, HMIS, or DOT identifiers. The company also uses this communication method when transporting hazardous chemicals
With OSHA’s Process Safety Management standard coming up on its 27th birthday, we are seeing companies still grappling with managing their Hazardous Locations (HAZLOC). When the process involves a flammable liquid or gas, it is still fairly common to find a HAZLOC containing permanently installed equipment that is not rated for the HAZLOC. And by
February 6, 2019 MEMORANDUM FOR: REGIONAL ADMINISTRATORS STATE PLAN DESIGNEESTHROUGH: KURT A. PETERMEYER
