UPDATE from my OSHA contacts: The NEP was written so that OSHA offices would not single out NH3 refrigeration and CL2 water treatment processes. OSHA feared that since these processes were so plentiful that they would target these types of processes and not inspect other types of processes, so in reality they were spelled out […]
Scenario: An employer requires ordinary safety-toe footwear throughout their facilities and pays for the first $100 of the footwear cost. As part of a recent company-wide static electricity control program, employees working with flammable liquids and products are now required to have static dissipative safety-toe footwear. Question 1: Would the static dissipative safety-toe footwear
This NPRM would update the SDO standards referenced in the three paragraphs that comprise the Acetylene Standard. The Compressed Gas Association (CGA) published several editions of these SDO standards after OSHA adopted them in 1974, and one of these standards (i.e., Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet G-1.4-1966), is no longer available for purchase from CGA. Therefore,
There is not a safety professional on this planet that has not had to deal with a worker putting side shields on their street glasses and trying to pass them off as “safety glasses”. These days we often get the argument from the worker that the lenses are “plastic and are the same as safety
This table shows the number of RMP facilities — facilities that could potentially have toxic or flammable chemical accidents with off-site consequences. Accident information is summed up from the most recent 5-year accident history for each reported facility. State # of RMP facilities # of accidents # of deaths # of injuries # evacuated Property
Yes, EPA has a General Duty Clause for RMP, much like OSHA’s General Duty Clause. However, EPA’s is much more detail. This month I came across a facility that used to be a RMP/PSM covered facility, but after much work they lowered their quantities below the RMP/PSM Thresholds. Once this was done, they literally threw
I have had tons of questions and comments on last week’s article regarding EPA’s General Duty Clause as it relates to RMP Listed chemicals (e.g. Extremely Hazardous Substances) and the requirements for employers, EVEN if they were below the RMP Threshold. As EPA states in one of their Fact Sheets on the GDC…It is important
Top 10 RMP Chemicals by On-Site Quantities This table shows amounts of each chemical within processes that have worst-case accidents that could potentially reach off-site. Facilities that are no longer registered with RMP are not included. Chemical Name Chemical Type # of facilities Pounds in processes Ammonia (anhydrous) Toxic 7,672 182,886,947,607 Flammable Mixture Flammable 669
H.R.2868 is to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to extend, modify, and recodify the authority of the Secretary of Homeland Security to enhance security and protect against acts of terrorism against chemical facilities, and for other purposes. This week a US House subcommittee passed chemical security legislation that critics said would change federal
When we do our many third-party S&H audits around the country, there are a few findings we could just leave on our spreadsheet as they are so common from business to business. One of these common findings is the lack of annual training for employees on their rights to access, view, copy, etc., their own
Install. Inspect. Protect. Smoke alarms save lives. If your smoke alarm was installed more than 10 years ago, it needs to be replaced. Find Out More at the U.S. Fire Administration{apos}s web site. {amp}raquo;
