NOTE: If you’re in an INDUSTRIAL facility, especially one with a PSM/RMP-covered process, B31.9 is NOT your piping RAGAGEP! IFC 5703.6.3 dictates that piping for flammable and combustible liquids must be hydrostatically tested to 150% of the maximum anticipated pressure (or pneumatically tested to 110%). However, it offers a carve-out: “Unless tested in accordance with […]
I get some interesting questions and see some very strange things in my work around the country, but this one seems to have grown legs in the world of “cost-cutting” in safety. “Let’s have our maintenance people do the ‘annual maintenance’ on our fire extinguishers”… um NO WAY! And this is just not a “Haywood
I will be fully upfront for those who wish to challenge me on this topic. YES, ASME B31.3 and 31.5 explicitly state that certain records that are required by the standard do NOT have to be “retained”. However, most people who challenge me on this topic fail to see that ittybitty two-letter word “if” in
Structural collapse caused the release of around 2,400kg of highly flammable liquid petroleum gas.HSE investigation found that long-standing corrosion of the steel tower was not dealt with.Workers exposed to the risk of serious injury and burns in a major incident. The refinery has been fined £1 million after a major gas leak following an investigation
The Chain of Failure The catastrophe centered on the unloading area for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) tanker trucks and unfolded over a matter of minutes. Botched Connection: Around 1:00 a.m., a driver attempted to connect an omnidirectional loading arm to the tanker’s discharge outlet. The connection procedure was complex, and the driver failed to secure
OSHA uses the General Duty Clause (GDC), Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act as a “gap filler” to cite employers for recognized chemical hazards when a specific standard (like the Process Safety Management standard, 29 CFR 1910.119) does not technically apply. There are some critical legal limitations on GDC Enforcement: OSHA’s ability to invoke 5(a)(1)
Not having an ammonia detection system, which had been cited the previous year, also as a GDC; however, it seems the business was sold, and the new owner was cited for not addressing the detection system.
As I said in my previous posts on GDC PSM citations, this is new territory for me and OSHA enforcement. I was always taught (and by some very sr. OSHA personnel) that OSHA can not use the GDC to enforce hazards for which OSHA already has a standard for. It was OSHA’s “carrot and stick”
Apparently, they can and have. Here are some GDC citations for an NH3 refrigeration process. These were part of a large release inspection that included some HAZWOPER and HAZCOM citations. My only guess is that these GDC citations are tied directly to the NH3 release, but I have not yet seen the field notes, so
The 2027 edition of the standard includes new definitions for the terms battery energy storage system and lithium-based battery with associated annex material. Updates have been made in Section 6.2 to align with NFPA 1 regarding 1A and 1B flammable gases and to further clarify that Category 1B has a lower flammability than Category 1A
A Hierarchy of Controls Analysis (HCA) is a highly structured risk-mitigation methodology. It is specifically required under CalARP Program 4, which applies to petroleum refineries operating within California. While a standard Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) identifies risks and lists existing safeguards, an HCA forces a facility to systematically evaluate whether hazards can be eliminated or
A Safer Technologies and Alternatives Analysis (STAA) is a systematic risk management evaluation used in process safety engineering to identify and assess ways to make a process inherently safer. Instead of relying solely on add-on safety equipment or administrative procedures to manage a hazard, an STAA asks: Can we eliminate or significantly reduce the hazard
