Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)

DOT tankers without their motive power may be PSM covered processes

A few years ago we were asked to participate in an engineering review/facility siting for a proposed facility.  The business was in a $ crunch so one way they decided to save some $ was to utilize DOT-306 tankers as “temporary storage tanks”, thus reducing the number of above-ground storage tanks AND a reduction in…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Pressure testing after breaking the boundry of previously tested piping circuit (Part 1)

Back in January 2019, I posted an article titled “Is API 570 your Piping Inspection/Repair RAGAGEP… Repair Requirements are now crystal clear” and this posting caused quite the stir with many of you.  Most of you followed the code(s) and went and verified what I shared in the article, but as usual, I got a…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Ammonia refrigeration and process chemistry

Over the years I have been told time and time again that there are two absolutes in ammonia refrigeration.  #1 – we do not have “temporary operational conditions” so we have no need for “temporary operating procedures” and #2 – there is no “process chemistry” in ammonia refrigeration.  But it dawned on me this week…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

The difference between an RMP Correction and Update and the six (6) changes that will trigger an Update

RMPs must be updated at least once every five years. EPA offers a  Checklist for Submitting your Risk Management Plan (RMP). We must fully update your RMP for resubmission sooner than the five-year anniversary date if any of these changes occur:… Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Technical BC launches Ammonia Safety Awareness Program

The Ammonia Safety Awareness Program was developed due to the rise of ammonia-related incidents and hazards over the past few years, including the tragedy at Fernie Memorial Arena.  Developed in collaboration with industry professionals, this program provides training and downloadable tools to fill in knowledge gaps and share best practices for maintaining ammonia refrigeration equipment and…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Did Technical BC just say pressure vessels in NH3 refrigeration need to be PWHT?

This topic has always been one that seemed to be controversial in the ammonia refrigeration sector, with decades of denial that Stress Corrosion Cracking could occur in an ammonia refrigeration process due to the water content in the ammonia.  But last month, Technical BC (British Columbia) discussing their SCC concerns related to pressure vessels in…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA addresses the forever on-going debate about revised RAGAGEPs and the facility’s responsibility to upgrade

One of the biggest and longest debates in process safety circles is the responsibility of businesses to upgrade their process design(s) based on an updated RAGAGEP.  OSHA attempted to address this in a 2016 LOI.  Now EPA has stated their “official position”… (emphasis by me)… Membership Required You must be a member to access this...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

On your next RMP 5-year Update, be sure to include this

At least every five (5) years a Risk Management Plan must be updated.  We are seeing a lot of RMP that have been updated in the past 12-16 months that failed to include this in their update.  I wrote about this new requirement this past weekend, but now I want to demonstrate the “fall-out” from…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Chlorine Dioxide released inside a tomato processing plant – 47 workers sent to hospital

On August 21, 2011, Forty-seven (47) employees, 38 from the primary employer and nine (9) from a secondary temporary agency, were sent to hospitals for treatment of respiratory irritation after being exposed to chlorine dioxide released inside a tomato processing plant. Three (3) employees were admitted for further treatment. The chlorine dioxide release was due…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA issues EPCRA citations @ meat processing facility (1,700 lbs NH3 release & $68K)

Respondent is the owner of the meat processing facility which utilizes anhydrous ammonia, a hazardous substance, at the Facility.  From December 28-30, 2017, Respondent inadvertently released approximately 1,700 pounds of ammonia due to a faulty isolation valve in the Facility’s refrigeration system (“the Release”). On December 13, 2018, EPA conducted an inspection of the Facility…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Chlorine (Cl2), the IFC, and treatment system

I have updated my original presentation from many moons ago (2005) for a new Cl2 client using the 2018 Edition of the International Fire Code (IFC) requirements for Storing, Using, Dispensing, and Handling Cl2.  SAFTENG members can log in and download the .ppt file which can be used as-is or it can be modified to…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Stop Valves in Pressure Relief Piping (ASME B31.3)

I have written about this topic numerous times, and each time it causes controversy among the SAFTENG members.  Some members are adamant that we should NEVER allow any “intervening valve(s)” in our pressure relief systems; others have seen it done many times.  ASME VIII does indeed allow “intervening valves” before and/or after a Pressure Relieving…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top