Chemical Process Safety (PSM/RMP)

PHMSA issues DRAFT FAQ for Midstream facilities and OSHA’s PSM

PHMSA provides written clarification regarding the pipeline safety regulations found at 49 CFR parts 190–199 in the form of FAQs and other guidance materials. PHMSA is requesting public comment on a set of DRAFT FAQs that were developed by the Working Group that was established by the Gas Pipeline Advisory Committee (GPAC) and the Technical…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Tenth Circuit Appeals court rules a boiler connected to a PSM/RMP covered process is part of the “covered process”

After a boiler exploded at a refinery, OSHA cited the refinery’s owner for violating 29 C.F.R. § 1910.119, which sets forth requirements for the management of highly hazardous chemicals. The Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (the Commission) upheld the violations. In doing so, it noted that the refinery had previously violated § 1910.119. But…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Emergency Response Coordination Activities Effective Date(s)

The RMP Amendments finalized on January 13, 2017, included a requirement for owners or operators of a stationary source to engage in emergency response coordination activities (40 CFR §68.93).  The regulatory text in 40 CFR §68.10(b) states that compliance with these activities must be completed by March 14, 2018.  Because the RMP Amendments were not…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Differences in accident history between Program 1 eligibility and the hazard assessment

Program 1 eligibility under 40 CFR §68.10(b) is contingent upon the process NOT having had an accidental release of a regulated substance that led to offsite death, injury, or response and restoration activities at an environmental receptor within five years prior to the risk management plan submission. Additionally, as part of the hazard assessment required…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Dispersion Modeling Systems Relevant to Homeland Security Preparedness and Response

As one of its core research focuses, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Homeland Security Research Program (HSRP) is interested in refining its tools and methodologies to better characterize the fate and transport of hazardous contaminants during all phases of an emergency response. Atmospheric dispersion modeling is one tool that can be used for effective…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Pipe Welding and Welder Qualifications (ASME B31.1 and 31.5)

If you’re installing/repairing/modifying your chemical process piping using ASME B31.3 and 31.5, these standards have some strict QA/QA requirements for who can make the welds to join the piping.  These welders MUST be qualified in accordance with ASME Code, Section IX, “Welding Qualifications.”  ASME Code, Section IX, Part QW-103.1, states that: “Each manufacturer or contractor…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

COVID safety changes may need an MOC when they impact a PSM/RMP process

We have seen hundreds of changes to our businesses since March and many of these changes were needed for worker protection, but recently we came across one such change that had serious potential to cause a bad event!  Maybe you have seen the latest and greatest devices for aiding in our “social distancing” efforts.  These…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Deficiencies in Process Piping Cause Gas Release Incidents (QA and MI programs)

An increased number of gas release incidents have occurred in the Gulf of Mexico Region due to leaks from cracked welds, ring gaskets, flange gaskets, inlet nozzles, pipeline risers, suction headers, pressure safety valves (PSVs), and fuel gas lines. These gas release incidents involve deficiencies in Quality Assurance and Mechanical Integrity programs and are caused…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Sampling the PSM/RMP covered process can be a serious risk

Just because we intend to handle minimal quantities of the HHC/EHS, the task of “catching a sample” from a covered process can, in fact be one of the more hazardous tasks our operators perform.  Remember, Risk = Frequency X Severity, so operators catch many samples over their shift means this task is a high-frequency task. …...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Do the quantities of two separate vessels that are interconnected with a closed valve need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis?

Pursuant to the risk management program regulations, facilities must perform an offsite consequence analysis for the worst-case release scenario. Do the quantities of two separate vessels that are interconnected with a closed valve need to be aggregated for the worst-case release scenario analysis? … Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Are mechanical controls such as alarms considered administrative controls and therefore limit the worst-case release quantity?

For the purpose of analyzing the worst-case release scenario required as part of the hazard assessment at 40 CFR Part 68, Subpart B, the worst-case release quantity is identified as the greatest amount held in a single vessel or pipe, taking into account administrative controls that limit the maximum quantity (40 CFR §68.25(b)). Are mechanical…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Worst-case release scenario “quantity released” reporting for a mixture

In section 2, element 2.5, of an RMP, facilities must report the quantity of toxic chemical that the facility used for the worst-case analysis. When reporting this data element in RMP*eSubmit for a mixture, should facilities report the entire weight of the toxic mixture potentially being released or only the amount of the regulated toxic…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top