Lockout Tagout

Using the “energy isolation plan” worksheet to meet specific LOTO procedures

OSHA’s Lockout/Tagout (LOTO) standard is pretty clear… ALL servicing and maintenance activities that require the control of hazardous energy require a machine/equipment SPECIFIC written procedure. (e.g. 1910.147(c)(4) 1910.147(c)(4)(i) Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section. So does…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Using the “energy isolation plan” worksheet to meet specific LOTO procedures Read More »

Documenting the “isolation” of a Permit-Required Confined Space

To continue with my series of LOTO articles this month, I want to discuss how 1910.147 plays into our efforts to enter a Permit-Required Confined Space (PRCS).  Way too many PRCS entry permits have the basic check-the-box statement “All energy sources isolated – YES/NO”.  What the heck is that suppose to meet?  Do our “machine…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Documenting the “isolation” of a Permit-Required Confined Space Read More »

Is a “Lockout device” more than a Lockout Lock?

As the debate continues about using “clamshells” as a lockout device, our behind-the-scenes discussions continue regarding OSHA’s use of the term “Substantial”. The discussion was so good I asked if I could summarize and post it to keep the discussions going. So once again, here is OSHA’s definition of a “Lockout device”: A device that…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Is a “Lockout device” more than a Lockout Lock? Read More »

Chemical Processes, LOTO, and three (3) program buckets (Simple, Traditional, Complex)

Way back in April 2016, the OSHRC published a decision that settled the argument about LOTO procedures for “specific equipment/machines” and what they must contain.  This important decision helped settle a lot of scuttlebutt about how LOTO gets managed in “complex” situations.  I like to explain to clients that LOTO in a chemical process is…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Chemical Processes, LOTO, and three (3) program buckets (Simple, Traditional, Complex) Read More »

LOTO, “Clam Shells”, OSHA, and “substantial”

To follow up on the post from yesterday regarding the use of these “lockout devices”, I was reminded by many of you in the same camp as me, that these devices are also highly questionable when we look at their ability to meet the “substantial“ requirement.  These safety pros all agreed that the use of…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

LOTO, “Clam Shells”, OSHA, and “substantial” Read More »

Do “clam shells” comply with OSHA’s definition of “Lockout Device”

UPFRONT DISCLAIMER:  I am not suggesting you throw out any of your LOTO devices or change your practices.  This is NOT advice, merely an attempt to demonstrate how some companies go above and beyond OSHA minimums. In my days working in the chemical industries, I had the pleasure of working with some of the finest plant managers,…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Do “clam shells” comply with OSHA’s definition of “Lockout Device” Read More »

NC-OSHA’s acceptable “Lockout Lock” identification method… would you accept this?

The state of NC has its own OSHA Plan (e.g., State Plan), but they use the Federal OSHA standards as their enforcement tools.  As like most state plans, their website is a buffet of safety materials that are free for the taking.  In fact, I used some of their materials when I was a safety manager in…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

NC-OSHA’s acceptable “Lockout Lock” identification method… would you accept this? Read More »

LOTO Fatality (TN-OSHA)

A 51-year-old female employee was fatally injured when she leaned into a machine and was pinned, resulting in crushing injuries to her head and neck. On the day of the incident, the victim was helping out on windshield #1 line due to low staffing levels resulting from inclement weather. She was to keep the line running and relieve…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

LOTO Fatality (TN-OSHA) Read More »

What is OSHA’s LOTO documentation requirements?

The standard specifies several information collection requirements. The following sections describe who uses the information collected under each requirement and how they use it. These requirements aim to control the release of hazardous energy while workers service, maintain, or repair machines or equipment when activation, startup, or release of energy from an energy source is…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

What is OSHA’s LOTO documentation requirements? Read More »

Did you see the “tagout” in CSB’s latest Bulletin

The US Chemical Safety Board’s (CSB) most recent Safety Bulletin: Key Lessons from the ExxonMobil Baton Rouge Refinery Isobutane Release and Fire was once again a great piece of work by the agency.  But as with most incidents, other underlying issues may have contributed (or not) to the incident.  In this bulletin, I could not help but notice…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Did you see the “tagout” in CSB’s latest Bulletin Read More »

Did the OSHRC just say that 1910.147 Appendix A without any revisions is an acceptable “machine specific” LOTO procedure?

The OSHRC sided with the company that used Appendix A from 1910.147 as their machine-specific LOTO procedure.  They did so without any revisions to the content of the Appendix, and the OSHRC found this as an acceptable machine-specific LOTO procedure!   … Membership Required You must be a member to access this content.View Membership LevelsAlready a...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Did the OSHRC just say that 1910.147 Appendix A without any revisions is an acceptable “machine specific” LOTO procedure? Read More »

OSHA issues REPEAT LOTO & Guarding Citations ($503,380)

A manufacturer of rigid metal, plastic, and hybrid containers faces $503,380 in proposed penalties after OSHA inspectors responded to four (4) separate reports of workers suffering injuries at the facility. As a result of its investigations, OSHA cited the business for five (5) repeated and five (5) serious safety violations of machine safety procedures and placed…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA issues REPEAT LOTO & Guarding Citations ($503,380) Read More »

Scroll to Top