The accident occurred in the hexane-based rapeseed oil extraction process. After grinding the seed and obtaining meal that is then steam-cooked (100°C), pressing in a continuous screw press is used to obtain 2/3 crude oil and flakes containing 1/3 oil. This oil is extracted from the flakes in the extraction process: the flakes are transported […]
Chlorine, CAS No. 7782-50-5, is an extremely hazardous substance regulated and listed in 40 C.F.R. § 68.130. As the owner and operator of a stationary source, with respect to the use and storage of ferric chloride and sodium hypochlorite, Respondent has a duty under the General Duty Clause, Section 112(r)(1) of the CAA, to design
The Respondent processes and freezes poultry products for distribution. The Respondent has two systems which include Anhydrous Ammonia at the Facility. The Respondent had one RMP program level 3 covered process (anhydrous ammonia refrigeration systems) which store or otherwise use a regulated substance in an amount exceeding the applicable threshold. The Respondent’s poultry freezing processes
The Cal/OSHA Process Safety Management Unit has cited a refinery and three contractors a combined $1,753,375 for serious safety violations following a confined space death of a 35-year-old worker who suffocated in a regenerator overflow well. Cal/OSHA inspectors cited three of the four employers with willful and serious violations after determining that they failed to
I am not sure who came up with this, but it is a classic example of far too many organizations.
As many of you know I have taken on a new client (full time) in 2022 and my role in this organization is to build a safety management system (SMS). And let me tell you what, if you thought explaining a RAGAGEP to management was difficult – try explaining that safety is a “process” and
The respondent is the owner and operator of a chemical manufacturing facility. EPA conducted an inspection of the Facility on May 1-4, 2018, to determine the Respondent’s compliance with Section 112(r) of the CAA and 40 C.F.R. Part 68. The following chemicals are “regulated substances” pursuant to 40 C.F.R. § 68.3. The threshold quantity for
Respondent owns and operates an ice-making plant that uses anhydrous ammonia in a refrigeration “process”. In 2016, Respondent filed a Program 3 RMP for the Process and reported that it used 22,000 pounds of anhydrous ammonia. In accordance with 40 C.F.R. § 68.10(a) and (f)-(h), the Respondent’s use, storage, and handling of anhydrous ammonia in
Respondent is a limited liability company that operates as a public warehousing facility. The term “have a general duty in the same manner and to the same extent as section 654 of title 29 [of the U. S. Code]” means owners and operators must comply with the General Duty Clause in the same manner and
I like to explain the documentation for our pressure vessels much in the same context as our birth certificates. For every pressure vessel in service today, we must have that vessel’s U-1 Form. And please don’t tell me about the OSHRC decision stating otherwise. I really don’t care what a group of lawyers think about
In the USA we use ASME Section VIII, Appendix M-5, and the National Board’s Part 4 when we need to install a block valve before or after a relief valve (RV). In Saskatchewan, Canada their safety authority has a program titled “Pressure Relief Path Stop Valve Control Program“. It is a really nice start to
These little safety devices cause such big troubles because of pure ignorance. I continue to have silly debates with very smart people about meeting the absolute bare minimums from so many different recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEPs). As of today, I have written about Hydrostatic Relief Valves 84 times. This week, I
