Safety Info Posts

Scissor Lift causes NH3 leak and serious chemical burns and severe respiratory damage

Here is an unfortunate incident that draws our attention to operating elevating equipment inside refrigerated spaces.  This incident also demonstrates the increased hazards to workers working within these elevated devices, as their means of egress, should there be a chemical release, is GREATLY compromised. Lastly, we should NOT lose sight of the fact that this…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

2018 Video of the Week #22 (New CPR Procedures)

This week Facebook provided the usual ton of garbage available in the human race!  This week a friend shared a posting about how Americans are calling Uber instead of an ambulance; not because Uber is faster, but because ambulance rides are so much more expensive.  This was what appeared to be a legitimate hit piece…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP Citations @ Water Treatment Plant (CL2 & $8K)

One of the things I find extremely unfair with EPA citations is that they are based on “revenue” of the business, as well as other factors.  I like it when it is applied to a “for-profit” business, but it is disproportionately UNFAIR when it is applied to a public utility like a water treatment plant. …...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA RMP Citations @ fruit processing plant and controlled temperature storage warehouse (NH3 & $53K)

The Company owns and operates a fruit processing plant and controlled temperature storage warehouse, near a mixed business-residential area approximately one half mile northeast of a college campus and approximately one-half mile east of a downtown area.  The facility uses anhydrous ammonia in a “closed-loop” refrigeration system. According to the Respondent, as of February 2,…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Why I no longer list “Relief System” as a PREVENTION Safe Gaurd in most of my “HIGH PRESSURE” scenario(s)

For years, PHA’s seemed to always list vessel “relief systems” as a “safeguard” for ALL the HIGH-PRESSURE scenarios involving the vessel.  In this article I want to challenge this practice; but to be up front, if you were to look at all my PHA’s I was guilty as sin for doing this very thing.  But…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Why I would never ask… “What if the RV has an incorrect set point” in my What-if Analysis

As I have stated already this week, I am a HAZOP kind of guy.  I have used just about every methodology under the sun over the past 25+ years, and I have come to a personal conclusion that in almost every occasion, a HAZOP would have been the best methodology to utilize for a correct…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

What is my FIRST LAYER of protection?

Earlier this week I posted about how a PHA should document its consideration of the engineering controls and administrative controls failing. And I said back in the 2013 posting; this little requirement is intended to make facilities dig past a single layer of protection and maybe even identify a lack of engineering and/or administrative controls…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

UPDATE on OSHRC and Court Decision on LOTO Fatality involving a counter weight

This is a follow-up to a previously posted case.  An electrical contractor at a steel mill was in a danger zone when the mill technician began locking out the equipment.  The LOTO procedure required some counterweights to be lowered to the ground (i.e., ZES).  When the mill technician released the counterweight, an apprentice with the…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

OSHA’s Potential Revisions to the Process Safety Management Standard

With all the recent attention being paid to EPA and it’s Risk Management Plan amendments and many of those amendments being rescinded by the new administration, I thought it would be a good time to remind those in the PSM/RMP world, that OSHA has their own wish list (my phrase – not theirs) and some of…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA’s Proposed Changes: Rescind Incident Investigation, Third-Party Audit, Safer Technology and Alternatives Analysis (STAA), and Other Prevention Program Amendments (May 2018)

In the RMP Amendments rule, EPA added three major provisions to the accident prevention program of Subparts C (for Program 2 processes)and D (for Program 3 processes). These included: A requirement in § 68.60 and § 68.81 for all facilities with Program 2 or 3 processes to conduct a root cause analysis using a recognized…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

EPA’s estimated costs of chemical accidents with off-site impacts

EPA monetized both on-site and off-site damages. EPA estimated total average annual on-site damages of $265.8 million. The largest monetized average annual on-site damage was on-site property damage, which resulted in average annual damage of approximately $205.5 million. The next largest impact was on-site fatalities ($49.8 million) and injuries ($10.5 million).  EPA estimated total average…...

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Scroll to Top