On March 18, 2024, @ 11:00 a.m., it appears that Employee #1, 32, was standing under the raised forks of a forklift truck. The forks/backrest assembly appeared to have fallen onto Employee #1. Employee #1 died due to decapitation.

On March 8, 2024, @ 4:50 p.m., an employee, 32, entered a unitizer (pallet stacker) machine when it engaged, crushing him. The employee was killed. CLICK HERE to see the video of the machine involved Company removed guards, failed to ensure power shutoff with workers nearby Both management and workers told inspectors that the permanent machine guards that attached directly to this specific...

To be clear, I can’t entirely agree with Alaska OSHRC’s decision to dismiss the OSHA citation.  But I am also tired of the blanketing workplaces with hi-vis gear that is NO LONGER “highly visible” or “reflective.”  These vests and other HI-VIS gear are used WAY beyond their intended life cycle, making safety a highly visible mockery.  If we feel this...

According to reports, the sewage explosion occurred during a pressure test of the septic tank pipeline conducted by qualified engineers as part of the pipeline installation process. This incident should be all we need to demonstrate why we test before the pressure retaining equipment is put into service and NEVER use hazardous materials to perform the pressure tests. https://www.freepressjou...

Safety should be an unwritten rule, a social norm, that workers follow regardless of the situation. It should become a value that is never questioned—never compromised. It is human nature to shift priorities, or behavioral hierarchies, according to situational demands or contingencies. But values remain constant. The early morning anecdote illustrates that the activity of “getting dressed” is a value...

I have this debate several times a year and always go to the “note” in 1910.146 related to the definition of “atmospheric hazards”.  And that is never enough to convince people that 1910.146 deals ONLY with ACUTE responses to atmospheric hazards – NOT chronic responses.  Now let’s be clear that chronic hazard MUST be addressed/managed, but it falls outside...

Respondent was the “owner or operator” of the Facility. The Facility’s refrigeration system used approximately 5,913 pounds of anhydrous ammonia. Accordingly, at the time of the violations alleged herein, Respondent operated a stationary source that handled and stored anhydrous ammonia, listed at 40 C.F.R. § 68.130, and thus was subject to the General Duty Clause found in section 112(r)(1) of the CAA. Because...

Respondent is the owner and operator of a facility where EPA inspected from May 17 to May 19, 2022, to determine Respondent’s compliance with Section 112(r) of the CAA and 40 C.F.R. Part 68 (“the Inspection”).  The Respondent’s facility is a metal alkyl manufacturing facility.  The facility produces a variety of highly reactive metal alkyls including aluminum, magnesium,...

Catastrophe requires multiple failures – single-point failures are not enough The array of defenses works. System operations are generally successful. Overt catastrophic failure occurs when small, apparently innocuous failures join to create opportunity for a systemic accident. Each of these small failures is necessary to cause catastrophe but only the combination is sufficient to permit failure. Put...

An ammonia leak occurred inside the machinery room of a public athletic club with indoor ice facilities. The leak happened during the decommissioning work of an ammonia refrigeration condenser by a licensed refrigeration contractor, which resulted in the facility enacting its Ammonia Release Emergency Protocol. The incident was likely caused by the contractor not properly purging and vacuuming the...

One of the top questions newcomers to process safety ask is, “Why do I have to have a written procedure to remove and install new relief valves?”From the EPSC Learning Sheet October 2024What Happened:The bonnet vent in a Balanced Bellows Pressure Safety Valve (BB-PSV) was found in service, but still fitted with a shipping plug. Internal leakage past the bellows would give back pressure,...

Respondent owns or operates the AMPI production facility that uses anhydrous ammonia in its refrigeration processes. From December 20, 2021, to May 17, 2022, EPA conducted an offsite compliance monitoring investigation of the Facility. During that investigation, the EPA representatives identified alleged violations of section 112(r)(1) of the CAA and section 312 of the EPCRA. EPA’S ALLEGED...