CLICK HERE to Renew your Membership
CLICK HERE for a NEW Membership
CLICK HERE to see eligibility requirements for FREE Membership
If you have any questions, please contact me

SAFTENG has:

Many THANKS to my NEW Members and those who CONTINUE to support SAFTENG:

Since 2015
Since 2020
Since 2012
Since 2025
Since 2005
Since 2015
Since 2009
Since 2025
since 2023
Since 2025
Since 2025
Since 2025
Since 2024
Since 2025
Hazard ID is fundamental to any SMS and an ALJ who gets it
Sometimes a lawyer or set of lawyers can surprise us… This is a quote from a recent OSHRC ALJ decision, regarding the employer’s responsibility to conduct inspections of the workplace to identify and correct hazards: "As an employer, Respondent is obligated to provide safe working conditions and ensure safe work practices. Implicit in that obligation is the requirement to inspect the workplace...
Read More
LOTO Safety Myth #1
I have written dozens of articles around these “safety myths”, but Jonathan Zimmerman and I were not selected to present this at ASSP several years ago so I thought I would share it as a series here. These are topics that I still get challenged on in 2024/2025 and often I am unable to convince the client of these facts. Like so many myths, the internet can be our own worst enemy. I would...
Read More
[My] Safety Thought of the Week… Culture of Safety
The recent news from Boeing’s CEO regarding their cultural challenges reminded me of a discussion I had with one of my favorite plant managers, Dale Fannin, in 1996. It was an uncomfortable discussion, as I had my a_s handed to me, regarding all my “cheerleading” rather than being a safety leader. Dale, as were two other PMs, was totally against all the safety banners and posters....
Read More
Victor_pic
When will the ammonia refrigeration industry finally embrace LOTO? (Part II)
Victor Dearman Jr. CIRO, CRST One of the challenges to my post was “What if the flagging tape was to indicate that the valve was in an abnormal position?” This was followed up with a challenge as to whether or not anything forbids such a method. Operating procedures should be designed to meet the requirements of IIAR Standard 7. In short, the only time valves would be manipulated to an...
Read More
CO2 Tank launches 100' off-site into a home (Flood Waters)
A soft drink manufacturer had a 3-ton capacity carbon dioxide (CO2) receiver tank at the plant. The tank contained 2000 pounds on the day of the explosion. The establishment was evacuated due to flooding river waters in the area. The plant was secured and evacuated. No employees were at the workplace. Suddenly, the storage tank rocketed 100 feet into a nearby house. Possible causes: … HomeRead...
Read More
Not recognizing "change of service" for Pressure Vessel(s) leads to catastrophic failure (Brittle Fracture Failure)
On September 19, 2002, Employee #1 was painting one (1) of six (6) tanks containing carbon dioxide when three (3) of them suddenly exploded. He was killed. The tanks were originally built as railroad tank cars for liquefied petroleum gas and they were not designed to store carbon dioxide. … HomeRead More »
Read More
osha-logo
OSHA settles "Worker overcome by carbon dioxide fumes at LAX dies"
At 7:00 a.m. on October 31, 2022, an employee, 36, was brazing a copper line in an electrical equipment room that was equipped with a carbon dioxide fire extinguishing system. The fire extinguishing system activated, discharging and flooding the room with carbon dioxide. The employee was unable to escape the room and was overcome and asphyxiated by the carbon dioxide. The employee was transported to...
Read More
OSHRC_logo
OSHRC establishes who is an "employee" vs. "independent contractor"
In response to a report of a fatality at Respondent’s place of business, Complainant initiated an inspection that concluded with Complainant issuing a four-item Citation and Notification of Penalty. For the most part, the specifics of the alleged violations—which include: a failure to train, a failure to cover floor holes, and a failure to properly guard a chop saw are not particularly complicated....
Read More
One of the questions I got after the CSB Update on the PV failure in KY was...
“Why did they have a Rupture Disc and a Relief Valve together?” As I alluded to in my post regarding CBS’s update, this arrangement is fairly common but comes with some very SPECIFIC requirements. These requirements can be found in: ASME Section VIII, UG-127 National Board, Part 4, 2.5.4 API 520, Part II, 9.1 But the top four (4) requirements, we as safety engineers should be looking...
Read More
API 520, Part II offers more guidance on "intervening valves" in a PRD path
I have shared the ASME and NBIC “code” requirements for these arrangements and it has already stirred a number of debates/questions; of which the API has offered some excellent guidance on this design. (emphasis by me) … HomeRead More »
Read More
The National Board on "intervening valves" in the PRV path (Car Seal)
It has grown tiresome, but it remains a teachable moment, to debate “engineers” who want part of ASME/NBIC to be the gospel and other parts not so much. The ammonia refrigeration industry just can’t seem to grasp the critical need in their “Common PRV Header Design” v.s. having more “holes in the roof” (as they like to point out). And today, I got word a technician...
Read More
Threaded Piping Connections and Hazardous Materials
Recently I was asked if “torquing” threaded pipe is required by code. I answered the inquiry by referring the client to ASME B1.20.1-2013, which states: 1.4 Sealing (NPT and NPSC Only)…1.4.3 Tightening Torque.Due to application-specific variables such as materials, wall thickness, operating pressures, etc., no guidance is given in this Standard regarding joint-tightening torque. However,...
Read More
1 13 14 15 16 17 692

Partner Organizations

Member Associations

Scroll to Top